[2024] KEHC 2626 (KLR)
The court found that the mandatory 20-year sentence imposed on the applicant for attempted defilement was unconstitutional in light of recent High Court decisions. The court further considered the applicant's mitigating circumstances, including his age at sentencing, lack of prior criminal record, demonstrated...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 2626 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Zacharia Mohamed Hamed; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E099 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Ruling
- Outcome
- sentence varied
- Judges
- A. Ong’injo
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Review, Mandatory Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Mitigating Factors
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zacharia Mohamed Hamed
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory 20-year imprisonment sentence for attempted defilement should be reviewed in light of recent constitutional decisions.
- 2 Whether the applicant's mitigating circumstances warrant a reduction of sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the mandatory 20-year sentence imposed on the applicant for attempted defilement was unconstitutional in light of recent High Court decisions. The court further considered the applicant's mitigating circumstances, including his age at sentencing, lack of prior criminal record, demonstrated remorse, and the substantial period already served in custody. The court relied on the probation officer's recommendation and determined that a substituted sentence of 2 years in custody and 3 years' probation was appropriate and just in the circumstances.
Court Disposition
sentence varied
Orders
- The applicant's sentence of 20 years imprisonment is substituted with 2 years in custody and 3 years' probation from the date of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Hamed v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E099 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 2626 (KLR) (8 March 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 2626 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Mombasa
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E099 of 2023
A. Ong’injo, J
March 8, 2024
Between
Zacharia Mohamed Hamed
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
Application 1. The applicant Abdul Akim Said was charged in Shanzu Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 685 of 2014 with the offence of attempted defilement contrary to Section 9 (1) (2) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006
2. The trial court found the applicant guilty of the offence of attempted defilement, convicted him and sentenced him to serve 20 years imprisonment for two counts.
3. The applicant being dissatisfied with the conviction and sentence appealed in the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa Criminal Appeal No. 69 of 2017 but the same was withdrawn to pursue the sentence review herein.
4. Vide Notice of Motion Application filed on 20th July 2023, the Applicant now seeks for review of the mandatory 20 years imprisonment sentence in consideration of the mitigating factors that he has indicated in his application namely: -i.That the applicant did not have any criminal record when being sentenced.ii.That the applicant was aged 58 years and showed remorse.iii.That the applicant has been in custody for a period of over 9 years with good reputation.
5. The applicant argued that Mativo, J. (as he then was) in Constitutional Petition No. 97 of 2021, Edwin Wachira & Others v Republic declared the mandatory sentences for sexual offenders unconstitutional. That additionally, Odunga, J. (as he then was) in Constitutional Petition No. E017 of 2021, Philip Mueke Maingi and Others v DPP declared the mandatory minimum sentences for sexual offenders unconstitutional.
6. The trial court file, Shanzu Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 685 of 2014, could not be traced for perusal by this court. However, the Sentence Review Report prepared by Abeid M. Abeid, the Senior Probation Officer Kisauni on 15th August 2023, was filed herein on 22nd February 2024. This court has established that the applicant was sentenced on 16th October 2015. He has been in custody for 8 years 5 months and after remission, he has approximately 5 years left to serve.
7. In consideration of the applicant’s application and recommendation by the probation officer, this court hereby orders that the applicant’s sentence shall be substituted with 2 years in custody and 3 years’ probation from today’s date.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT/ONLINE THROUGH MS TEAMS, THIS 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2024. HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJOJUDGEIn the presence of: -Etropia- Court AssistantMr. Ngiri for the RespondentApplicant present in person