[2020] KEHC 7100 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 7100 (KLR)

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence previously imposed on the petitioner was unconstitutional. The court considered the gravity of the offences, which included multiple counts of robbery with violence and gang rape, as well as the petitioner's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 7100 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Hamisi Mangale Burehe; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 47 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Resentencing After Exhaustion of Appeals
Outcome
Death sentence set aside; petitioner resentenced to 24 years imprisonment from date of arrest.
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Mandatory Death Sentence, Resentencing Jurisdiction, Robbery With Violence, Judicial Discretion in Sentencing
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Mandatory Death Sentence Resentencing Jurisdiction Robbery With Violence Judicial Discretion in Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hamisi Mangale Burehe

Petitioner

Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Resentencing After Exhaustion of Appeals

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner is unconstitutional following the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic [2017] eKLR.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing and, if so, what sentence is appropriate given the gravity of the offences committed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence previously imposed on the petitioner was unconstitutional. The court considered the gravity of the offences, which included multiple counts of robbery with violence and gang rape, as well as the petitioner's remorse and the period already served. Balancing these factors, the court exercised its discretion to set aside the death sentence and imposed a custodial sentence of 24 years from the date of arrest, emphasizing the need for punishment proportionate to the seriousness of the crimes and the message that crime does not pay.

Court Disposition

Death sentence set aside; petitioner resentenced to 24 years imprisonment from date of arrest.

Orders

  • The death sentence imposed on the petitioner by the trial court is set aside.
  • The petitioner is sentenced to twenty four (24) years imprisonment from the date of arrest.