[2007] KEHC 1363 (KLR)
The omission of the decree from the record of appeal is a fatal defect under Order XLI Rule 8B(4) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The appellant had two opportunities to rectify the omission, including after obtaining leave to file a supplementary record, but failed to do so. The mandatory nature of the rule and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 1363 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Hamzaali Jiwaji; Respondent: Said Mahdy
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 13A of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Record of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal struck out with costs to the respondent
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Record Requirements, Mandatory Documents, Striking Out Appeal, Court Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hamzaali Jiwaji
Appellant
Said Mahdy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Record of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the omission of the decree from the record of appeal is fatal to the appeal.
- 2 Whether the court should exercise discretion to allow the appeal to proceed despite the omission.
Ratio Decidendi
The omission of the decree from the record of appeal is a fatal defect under Order XLI Rule 8B(4) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The appellant had two opportunities to rectify the omission, including after obtaining leave to file a supplementary record, but failed to do so. The mandatory nature of the rule and the repeated failure to comply deprived the appellant of the court's discretion. Consequently, the appeal could not be allowed to proceed and was struck out with costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
appeal struck out with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The appeal is struck out.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MALINDI
Civil Appeal 13A of 2004
HAMZAALI JIWAJI……………...……………….APPELLANT
VERSUS
SAID MAHDY…………………...…….……….RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
At the hearing of the appeal the advocate for the appellant, on enquiry by the court, conceded that the decree appealed from was omitted from the record of appeal. He further conceded that order XLI Rule 8B (4), of the Civil Procedure Rules makes it mandatory to file the decree before allowing the appeal to go for hearing.
The advocate for the respondent, going by the concessions aforesaid, urged me to find that the said omission are so grave more so in the light of the fact that on 8th March 2007 the appellant had moved the court and did file a further supplementary affidavit which also omitted the decree.
Consequently, it was his case that the appeal should be struck out.
Order XLI Rule 8 B (4) provides:
Before allowing the appeal to go for hearing the judge shall be satisfied that the following documents are on the court record, and that such of them as are not in the possession of either party have been served on that party, that is to say:-
(a) the memorandum of appeal;
(b) the pleadings;
(c) the notes of the trial magistrate made at the hearing: notes made at the hearing;
(d) the transcript of any official shorthand or palantypist notes made at the hearing;
(e) where the appeal is from a decision of a subordinate court given in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction,
the documents corresponding to those specified in paragraphs (a) to
(f)inclusive so far as they relate to the appeal to such subordinate court:
Provided that:-
(i) a translation into English shall be provided of any document not in that language.
(ii) The judge may dispense with the production of any document or part of a document which is not relevant other than those specified in paragraphs (a) (b) and (f).
In my considered view the omission is fatal. The problem is compounded by the fact that the appellant had also sought and obtained leave to file supplementary record of appeal which also omitted the decree appealed from. The appellant has had two chances to put his house in order and squandered both. In the result, I hold that the appellant no longer deserves my discretion. Accordingly, I am left with no alternative other than to strike out the appeal, which I hereby do, with costs to the respondent.
DATED and DELIVERED at Malindi this 24th
Day of May 2007.
N.R.O.OMBIJA
J U D G E
Mr.Shujaa } for respondent.
Mr.Mouko } for appellant
For Jiwaji _____________________