[1999] KEHC 131 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff failed to plead and prove the particulars of her injuries, as required by law. No medical evidence or report was produced to substantiate the alleged injuries. The plaint merely stated that particulars of injuries would be adduced in court, which does not meet the threshold for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1999] KEHC 131 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Hannah Njeri Wanjau; Defendant: The Driver of KWR 893; Defendant: Samuel Mwangi Kingori
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 1273 of 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- suit dismissed with costs to the defendants
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injury, Motor Vehicle Accident, Soft Tissue Injuries
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hannah Njeri Wanjau
Plaintiff
The Driver of KWR 893
Defendant
Samuel Mwangi Kingori
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff sustained injuries as a result of the motor vehicle accident and is entitled to damages.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff pleaded and proved particulars of injuries and special damages.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff failed to plead and prove the particulars of her injuries, as required by law. No medical evidence or report was produced to substantiate the alleged injuries. The plaint merely stated that particulars of injuries would be adduced in court, which does not meet the threshold for pleading. In the absence of evidence, the court could not make an award for damages. The suit was therefore dismissed, and even if the court were to make an award, it would not exceed Ksh.5,000 for soft tissue injuries, given the lack of proof and the nature of the injuries described.
Court Disposition
suit dismissed with costs to the defendants
Orders
- The suit is dismissed with costs to the defendants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
48 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CIVIL CASE 1273 OF 1989
HANNAH NJERI WANJAU ......................................... PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
1 THE DRIVER OF KWR 893
2. SAMUEL MWANGI KINGORI ............................ DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
There are two Plaintiffs in this case who filed suit jointly against the defendants.
The advocate for the Plaintiff informs me that the case for the Plaintiff No.1 has been settled and is therefore finalised out of court.
This is a running down case. The Plaint dated the 20. 3.89 was filed on the 22. 3.89. It was amended on 19. 7.90 and filed on a date which is not legible on the Plaint.
The brief facts according to the Plaint is that the Plaintiff and the co-plaintiff were lawful fare paying passengers on motor vehicle KWR 893 belonging to the second defendant and driven by the first defendant.
The Plaintiff sustained injuries.
When the case came up for hearing before me on the 4th of May, 1999 the parties had entered into a consent whereby liability as admitted at 100% against the defendant and judgement duly entered.
The Plaintiff who has waited ten years for her case to be heard finally gave evidence whereby she stated that she was aged 95 years old. According to her ID card she was born in 1904 but was not sure.
On the material day of the 8. 6.89 she was travelling in a motor vehicle. It had an accident. She did not recall what occurred.
It was because she had lost consciousness. She was admitted to hospital for 4-5 days. She had a cut across her forehead.
The advocate for the plaintiff prayed that this court award the plaintiff a sum of Ksh.200,000/- for Pain, suffering and loss of amenities. He relied on the cases of
Mary Wanjiru Mwangi v Charles Runo Nyaga & Another
Hccc 5304/91
Philip Nicholas Okaka V. /Anderson Njue & 3 Others
Hccc 2434 of 87 (unreported.
He nonetheless did admit that besides a head injury, the injuries sustained by the plaintiff in those cases included fracture.
He said that the plaintiff suffered headaches.
In a reply the advocate for the defendant relied on the authorities ofFredrick Hinga Barae V. Mrs. Kanniga Chaotakoongit
Hccc No.5634/1989
Kenneth Onyango & 4 Others v Hassan Genya Juma & Ano.
Hccc 3944/90
Which dealt with soft tissue injuries. Awards of Ksh.45,000/- and Ksh.30,000/- respectively were made.
The advocate for the plaintiff stated that decisions were made by one Judge and that the authorities was almost 10 years old.
I find that the plaintiff spoke of a cut over her forehead between her eye brows. She spoke of injuries to her legs and knees.
It was her advocate who stated that these were soft tissue injuries.
There was no doctor available to give evidence at the time of trial to confirm these injuries. No medical report to prove the same was produced.
In view of this I would find that there has been no evidence before the court to show that the plaintiff sustained injuries. I would therefore dismiss this suit.
In the event that I am called to make a finding. I would not award for soft tissue injuries more than Ksh.5,000/-.
One is bound by their pleadings. The plaintiff herein did not plead particulars of injuries. All that was stated was “to be adduced in court.”
This is not particulars and as such the plaint falls short of its requirement.
There has been no Special Damages pleaded or spoken off. I decline to make any award under this heading.
See the case of
Coast Bus Service Ltd.
v
Sisco E. Murunga Nanyi & Others
CA 192 of 1992 court of appeal.
I hereby dismiss this suit with costs to the defendants.
Dated this 5th day of May, 1999 at Nairobi.
M.A. ANG’AWA
JUDGE