[2011] KEHC 3908 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants' claim to be children of the deceased is contested and unresolved at this stage. The respondent does not deny that the applicants' mother was married to the deceased, but disputes the applicants' biological relationship to the deceased. The court held that the issue of whether the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 3908 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Hannah Shilavukha; Applicant: Moses Lidonde; Applicant: Agripinah Lichungu Litonde
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 123 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Be Included as Survivors and Determination of Inheritance Rights
- Outcome
- Application determined with directions for further proceedings at confirmation of grant.
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Grant of Letters of Administration, Confirmation of Grant, Inheritance Rights, Status of Children
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hannah Shilavukha
Respondent
Moses Lidonde
Applicant
Agripinah Lichungu Litonde
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Be Included as Survivors and Determination of Inheritance Rights
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants, Moses Lidonde and Agripinah Lichungu Litonde, should be included as survivors of the deceased for purposes of inheritance.
- 2 Whether the applicants are biological children of the deceased and entitled to inherit directly or only through their mother.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants' claim to be children of the deceased is contested and unresolved at this stage. The respondent does not deny that the applicants' mother was married to the deceased, but disputes the applicants' biological relationship to the deceased. The court held that the issue of whether the applicants are entitled to inherit directly or only through their mother can only be determined at the confirmation of grant stage. Accordingly, the court ordered the petitioner to file a summons for confirmation of grant and serve it on the applicants and their mother, after which the court will make a determination on the applicants' entitlement to the estate.
Court Disposition
Application determined with directions for further proceedings at confirmation of grant.
Orders
- The petitioner shall file a summons for confirmation of grant within 45 days and serve it on Christine Naliaka and the applicants.
- The court will determine the applicants' entitlement to the estate at the confirmation of grant stage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAKAMEGA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 123 OF 2006
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE REUBEN LIDONDE – DECEASED
BETWEEN
HANNAH SHILAVUKHA ....................................................................................PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
VERSUS
1. MOSES LITONDE)
2. AGRIPINAH LICHUNGU LITONDE) ...............................................................OBJECTORS/APPLICANTS
RULING
1. Reuben Lidondedied on 25. 10. 2004 and on 17. 3.2006, his widow, Hannah Shilavukha petitioned for a grant of Letters of administration intestate to his estate.The grant was issued on 27. 9.2006 by G. B. M. Kariuki, J. and before the same could be confirmed, on 11. 11. 2009, Agripina Lichungu Litonde and Moses Lidonde sought orders under Rule 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules for orders that they should be included as survivors of the deceased and their inheritance determined.
2. In a short and precise Supporting Affidavit sworn on 9. 11. 2009, Agripina Lichungu aforesaid stated that the deceased was their father and that they were left out of the list of survivors when the Petition was filed. That they stand to suffer great loss if they do not inherit any part of the deceased’s estate.
3. In response, the Petitioner filed a Replying Affidavit on 11. 3.2010 and stated that the Applicants are not biological children of the deceased and that their mother, Christine Naliaka Barasa, married the deceased after the Applicants were born. That the deceased later bought a parcel of land for the said Christine Naliaka and Moses Litonde aforesaid and I note that title No. S/Kabras/Chesero/2170 is in their joint names (annexture “AS1”). Further, that the deceased had divided his property before he died and the Applicants occupy the portion allocated to their mother.
4. The matter before me is simple. The Petitioner does not deny that the Applicant’s mother was married to the deceased. She also stated in the Petition that the following persons survived the deceased;
(i)Mrs. Hannah Shilavukha – Widow
(ii)David Masinza lidonde
(iii)Silvanus Khayati
(iv)Agnes Shilwatsi
(v)Victor S.
(vi)Gladys B.
(vii)Getrude I.
(viii)Vincent A.
(ix)Esther LA
(x)Christine Nalyaka
(xi)Joseph Lilumo Lidonde
(xii)Mr. Luka Mutsamu Anami
(xiii)Samson Libuki(emphasis added)
5. One of the survivors is Christine Naliaka, the Applicant’s mother, and it seems to me that the Applicants have not been recorded as being survivors for reasons that they are not biological children of the deceased. That issue is of course contested and at this stage all I can do is to order as follows;
6. Let the Petitioner file a Summons for Confirmation of Grant within 45 days and serve it on Christine Naliaka as well as the Applicants. Once that is done, this court will determine whether the Applicants are entitled to inherit part of the deceased’s estate directly or through their mother.
7. The application dated 9. 11. 2009 is determined in those terms.
8. Orders accordingly.
Delivered, Dated and Signed at Kakamega this 22nd day of February, 2011.
ISAAC LENAOLA
J U D G E