[2010] KEHC 3906 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove that the deceased in this cause was one of the purchasers of the suit property as per the indenture, or that the respondent was collecting rent from the property in question. The indenture cited did not conclusively identify the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 3906 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Hannah Wanja; Respondent: Wambui Gachingu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 326 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- SP Ouko
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Estates, Letters of Administration, Joint Property Ownership, Proof of Title, Injunctive Relief
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hannah Wanja
Applicant
Wambui Gachingu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant and co-petitioners should be authorized to collect rent from L.R. No.453/2 Nakuru Municipality.
- 2 Whether the respondent should be restrained from collecting rent from the said property.
- 3 Whether sufficient evidence exists to prove the deceased's ownership of the property in question.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove that the deceased in this cause was one of the purchasers of the suit property as per the indenture, or that the respondent was collecting rent from the property in question. The indenture cited did not conclusively identify the deceased as a purchaser, and no affidavit was provided by the surviving brother to support the applicant's claim. Furthermore, the respondent was not shown to be the legal representative of her late husband, and the suit property was not listed in the succession petition as part of the deceased's estate. Consequently, the application lacked merit and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
Succession Cause 326 of 2008
HANNAH WANJA……….……………………….APPLICANT
VERSUS
WAMBUI GACHINGU.……………………….RESPONDENT
RULING
A temporary grant of letters of administration intestate was granted to the applicant and two others in respect of the deceased person’s estate in this cause on 23rd October, 2008. The applicant now brings the instant application for an order that the petitioners be authorized to collect rent from three (3) shops comprised in L.R. No.453/2 Nakuru Municipality which was purchased and developed jointly by the deceased and his two brothers. The applicant further seeks that the respondent, Wambui Gachingu, the widow of one of the deceased person’s brothers be restrained from collecting rent from the said property.
In reply, the respondent has denied collecting rent from the property in question but admits collecting rent from her deceased husband’s property known as L.R. Nakuru Municipality Block 2/309.
I have considered the foregoing averments. The applicant has deposed that the suit property was purchased and developed jointlyby the deceased in this cause and his two brothers, Harun Gachingu and another whose name has not been disclosed. It is further deposed that two of the three brothers, the deceased herein and Harun Gachingu are now deceased and that the brother who is alive is in support of this application.
First and foremost, the basis of this claim is an indenture dated 10th September, 1969 made between Gachingu Kamau as the Vendor and the said Gachingu Kamau, Nganga son of Kamau and Kimani son of Kamau as the purchasers. It was in respect of a property described as follows:
“Plot Number Thirty-Three of Section Twenty –Two (Land Reference Number 453/2) in Nakuru Municipality”
at a consideration of Kshs.4,000/=.
First the indenture identifies three persons as the purchasers, namely Gachingu Kamau who incidentally is also the vendor, Nganga son of Kamau and Kimani son of Kamau. There is no evidence that Kimani son of Kamau is the same person as the deceased in this cause, John Kimani Mahugu. Secondly, an indenture per se cannot be proof of ownership of a property.
Thirdly, the third brother to the deceased who is alive and is said to be in support of this application has not sworn an affidavit to confirm that support.
The fourth point is that there is no evidence that the respondent is the legal representative of her late husband, Harun Gachungi, to qualify to be sued.
Finally, the respondent having asserted that she has never collected rent from No.453/2, it was incumbent upon the applicant to rebut this by presenting evidence that the respondent has indeed been collecting rent from the suit property or to link the two properties.
I may also add that the suit property has not been listed in the petition in this cause as the deceased person’s property.
For these reasons, the application fails and is dismissed with costs.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Nakuru this 22nd day of January, 2010.
W. OUKO
JUDGE