[2015] KEHC 1289 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1289 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioner.s constitutional right to social security under Article 43(1) had been violated by the respondents' failure to pay his terminal dues as ordered by a previous court judgment. The respondents' partial payment constituted an admission of liability, and the continued withholding of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 1289 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hannington Owaka Okolo; Respondent: The Cabinet Secretary Treasury; Respondent: The Director of Pensions
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition 19 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
Petition allowed.
Legal Topics
Economic and Social Rights, Social Security, Pension Entitlements, Right to Fair Labour Practices
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Employment and Labour Economic and Social Rights Social Security Pension Entitlements Right to Fair Labour Practices

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hannington Owaka Okolo

Applicant

The Cabinet Secretary Treasury

Respondent

The Director of Pensions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondents violated the petitioner.s right to social security by failing to pay his terminal dues.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to payment of his pension and terminal benefits as ordered by the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioner.s constitutional right to social security under Article 43(1) had been violated by the respondents' failure to pay his terminal dues as ordered by a previous court judgment. The respondents' partial payment constituted an admission of liability, and the continued withholding of the balance was unjustified. The court emphasized that the judgment in Kisumu CMCC 221/1993 was never appealed or set aside, and thus remained binding and enforceable. The petitioner, having served as a civil servant for approximately 30 years, was entitled to full enjoyment of his retirement benefits. The court therefore allowed the petition and ordered payment of the...

Court Disposition

Petition allowed.

Orders

  • The petition dated 10.9.14 is allowed in terms of prayer (3).
  • The petitioner shall have costs of this petition.