[2006] KEHC 1183 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had failed to take any steps to prosecute the suit for almost three years after it was adjourned generally. The plaintiff's advocate had not responded to the application for dismissal, nor had the plaintiff set the matter down for hearing. The court held that under Order 16 rule 5...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1183 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Haraka Hire Purchase; Defendant: Wessel Gunter; Defendant: Weserport (EPZ) Ltd.
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 44 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- suit dismissed for want of prosecution
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Adjournment, Case Management
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Haraka Hire Purchase
Plaintiff
Wessel Gunter
Defendant
Weserport (EPZ) Ltd.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 16 rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had failed to take any steps to prosecute the suit for almost three years after it was adjourned generally. The plaintiff's advocate had not responded to the application for dismissal, nor had the plaintiff set the matter down for hearing. The court held that under Order 16 rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the defendant was entitled to seek dismissal for want of prosecution. The prolonged inactivity by the plaintiff justified the dismissal of the suit, and the court exercised its discretion accordingly.
Court Disposition
suit dismissed for want of prosecution
Orders
- The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
- The defendant is awarded the costs of the application dated 1st February 2006 and the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS) Civil Suit 44 of 2001
HARAKA HIRE PURCHASE…………….........................………………….. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
WESSEL GUNTER ……………………......................………………1ST DEFENDANT
WESERPORT (EPZ) LTD. ……………......................……………..2ND DEFENDANT
RULING
The defendant is seeking the dismissal of the plaintiff’s suit for want of prosecution.
The suit was filed on 16th January 2001, and a Defence thereto was filed on 20th March 2001.
According to the court records, the suit has been fixed for hearing on only one occasion, which was on 17th and 18th of June 2003.
When the case came up for hearing before the Hon. Nyamu J., on 18th June 2003, the advocate for the plaintiff sought an adjournment, on the grounds that the plaintiff’s witness was abroad. As the defendant did not oppose the application for adjournment, the case was adjourned indefinitely. Since that date, the plaintiff has taken absolutely no steps to have the case set down for hearing.
Pursuant to the provisions of Order 16 rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules, if a case has been adjourned generally, and it is thereafter not set down for hearing within three months, the defendant is entitled to either set the suit down for hearing or apply for its dismissal.
By bringing this application for dismissal, the defendant herein has exercised one of the options available to it.
Even though the plaintiff’s advocates have been served with the application, they have failed to respond thereto, in any manner. Accordingly, as it is almost three years since the case was last adjourned, I find the defendant’s application justified. I therefore hereby order that the suit herein be dismissed, for want of prosecution. The defendant is awarded the costs for both the application dated 1st February 2006, as well as for the suit itself.
Dated and Delivered at Nairobi this 29th day of May 2006.
FRED A. OCHIENG
JUDGE