[2022] KEELRC 704 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 704 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was employed under two distinct contracts, with the first contract terminating in January 2017 and the second contract running from February to October 2019. Since the claim was filed in July 2020, any claims arising from the first contract were time-barred under Section 90 of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 704 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Harliet Mukami Njenga; Respondent: Tsavo City Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E303 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection partially upheld
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation of Actions Employment Contracts Termination of Employment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Harliet Mukami Njenga

Claimant

Tsavo City Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the claim relating to the 2015-2017 contract is time-barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act.
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear claims arising from the 2015-2017 contract.
  3. 3 Whether the claim relating to the 2019 contract is within the statutory limitation period.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was employed under two distinct contracts, with the first contract terminating in January 2017 and the second contract running from February to October 2019. Since the claim was filed in July 2020, any claims arising from the first contract were time-barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act, which requires employment claims to be brought within three years. The court therefore lacked jurisdiction over the first contract. However, the claim relating to the second contract was filed within the limitation period and could proceed. The court ordered that all pleadings and remedies relating to the first contract be expunged from the record, and allowed...

Court Disposition

preliminary objection partially upheld

Orders

  • The pleadings and remedies under the first contract are expunged from the record.
  • The claimant is free to prosecute the claim with regard to the second contract.