[2014] KEHC 1980 (KLR)
The High Court found that the trial court properly evaluated the evidence, giving due weight to the credibility of the complainant and corroborating witnesses. The complainant's identification of the appellant was reliable, as she knew him previously and recognized him under favorable conditions. Medical evidence...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 1980 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Haron Dennis Mandela; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 10 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- J Karanja
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Rape, Evidence Evaluation, Credibility of Witnesses
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Haron Dennis Mandela
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution proved the charge of rape against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt.
- 2 Whether the identification of the appellant as the perpetrator was reliable and credible.
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was lawful and appropriate.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the trial court properly evaluated the evidence, giving due weight to the credibility of the complainant and corroborating witnesses. The complainant's identification of the appellant was reliable, as she knew him previously and recognized him under favorable conditions. Medical evidence confirmed the rape and the complainant's pregnancy. The appellant's defence was found to be a mere denial and not credible in light of the prosecution's consistent and corroborated evidence. The appellate court saw no reason to interfere with the trial court's findings on credibility or the sentence imposed, holding that both conviction and sentence were lawful and appropriate.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed in its entirety.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITALE
HCCR. APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2014
HARON DENNIS MANDELA::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::RESPONDENT
[Being an appeal from original conviction and sentence by Hon. H. O. Barasa, Principal Magistrate at Lodwar on 8th October, 2013, Criminal Case No. 337 of 2013]
J U D G M E N T
The appellant, Haron Dennis Mandela, was convicted and sentenced to ten (10) years imprisonment by the Principal Magistrate at Lodwar for rape, contrary to section 3 of the Sexual Offences Act.
It was alleged that on the 28th April, 2013, in Turkana West District, the appellant had sexual intercourse with L N without her consent.
There was an alternative count of committing an indecent act with the same person, but the conviction was on the main count.
Being dissatisfied with the conviction and sentence, the appellant filed the present appeal on grounds contained in the petition of appeal dated 10th February, 2014.
The appellant appeared in person at the hearing of the appeal and relied on his written submissions in support of his case.
The Learned Prosecution Counsel, M/S Limo appeared for the State/Respondent and opposed the appeal by submitting that the conviction and sentence was proper as the complainant (PW1) narrated how the appellant entered her house and attempted to rape her. Without giving up, he later raped her while she was heading to her husband's work place. That, the incident was confirmed by PW2.
On sentence, the Learned Prosecution Counsel submitted that since the complainant was seven months pregnant at the time of the offence, the sentence of ten (10) years imposed on the appellant was lenient. That, the issue pertaining to the appellant's long, stay in police custody was never raised at the trial and if anything, the appellant may seek civil remedy. That, the four (4) witnesses who testified for the prosecution corroborated the complainant's evidence which could still be relied upon on its own.
The Learned Prosecution Counsel contended that the prosecution case was proved beyond reasonable doubt and called for the dismissal of the appeal.
Having considered the appeal on the basis of the supporting grounds and the submissions by both sides, it is apparent that the evidence presented before the trial court which this court has re-visited bearing in mind that the trial court had the advantage of seeing the witnesses, raised no particular dispute that the offence was committed and that the only bone of contention was the alleged involvement of the appellant in the same.
The complainant, L N (PW1), indicated that initially there was an attempt to rape her but it did not succeed. Later on the same date, she was waylaid and raped as she was proceeding to her husband's work place. She implicated the appellant whom she had previously known. She contended that she did not consent to the act and indicated that favourable condition existed for her to recognize the appellant as it was during the night.
The complainant husband, LS (PW2), confirmed that the complainant reported to him that she had been raped by the appellant. The report was also made to a security officer with the Ugandan Community at the Kakuma Refugee Camp, Alex Oloya (PW3).
Dr. Wanjiku Gichuru (PW4), confirmed that the complainant was indeed raped and was pregnant at the time.
P.C Kassim Said (PW5), received the necessary report at Kakuma police station and commenced investigations. He later preferred the present charge against the appellant.
In his defence, the appellant denied the offence and implied that he was arrested and implicated after being branded a stranger and being suspected to be among persons who normally attacked others within the Kakuma Ugandan Community zone. Added to that, his father was branded a murderer and the name Dennis Mandela was branded on his (appellant).
The learned trial magistrate after considering the evidence by both the prosecution and the defence, believed the prosecution's version and disbelieved that of the defence.
The finding by the learned trial magistrate were thus based on the credibility of the witnesses and this court would have no reason to interfere with that and must also hold that the appellant was the person responsible for raping the complainant.
His conviction was sound and proper and the sentence meted on him was lawful and adequate.
In sum, this appeal is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed in its entirety.
J. R. KARANJA
JUDGE
22/10/2014
[Delivered & signed this 22nd day of October, 2014]