[2019] KECA 979 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 979 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal held that, in line with its previous decisions and the interpretation of Section 85A of the Elections Act, a second appeal does not lie to the Court of Appeal from the High Court in its appellate jurisdiction regarding the validity of the election of a Member of County Assembly. The Court found...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KECA 979 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Harriet Kerubo Ongera; Respondent: Rose Moturi Mwene; Respondent: Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Jubilee Party; Respondent: Kisii County Assembly
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Election Appeal 43 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Election Petition Application / Application to Strike Out Record of Appeal
Outcome
application allowed; appeal struck out as incompetent
Judges
AM Githinji, GG Okwengu, A Mohammed
Legal Topics
Appellate Jurisdiction, Second Appeals, Nomination Disputes, Party Lists, County Assembly Elections
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Constitutional Law Appellate Jurisdiction Second Appeals Nomination Disputes Party Lists County Assembly Elections

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Harriet Kerubo Ongera

Applicant

Rose Moturi Mwene

Respondent

Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Jubilee Party

Respondent

Kisii County Assembly

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition Application / Application to Strike Out Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Does a second appeal lie to the Court of Appeal from the High Court in its appellate jurisdiction concerning the validity of the election of a Member of County Assembly?
  2. 2 Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal under the Constitution and Elections Act?

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that, in line with its previous decisions and the interpretation of Section 85A of the Elections Act, a second appeal does not lie to the Court of Appeal from the High Court in its appellate jurisdiction regarding the validity of the election of a Member of County Assembly. The Court found that it had no jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal, and that the constitutional and statutory framework governing electoral dispute resolution does not provide for a further appeal to the Court of Appeal in these circumstances. The application to strike out the appeal was therefore allowed, and the appeal was struck out as incompetent.

Court Disposition

application allowed; appeal struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • Election Petition Appeal No. 43 of 2018 is struck out as incompetent.
  • Costs awarded to the applicant and IEBC against the 1st respondent.