[2022] KEHC 2237 (KLR)
The court found that judgment had been entered in favour of the plaintiff against the government for Ksh.42,175 on 24th November 2021. More than 21 days had elapsed since the date of judgment, and the plaintiff had made a proper application for a certificate of order against the government as required by Section...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 2237 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Hartwell J.M. Manzighe; Defendant: The Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 3008 of 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Certificate of Order Against the Government
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- JK Sergon
- Legal Topics
- Government Proceedings, Execution of Decrees, Certificate of Order, Judgment Enforcement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hartwell J.M. Manzighe
Plaintiff
The Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Certificate of Order Against the Government
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a certificate of order against the government for execution of the decree.
- 2 Whether the requirements under Section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act have been satisfied.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that judgment had been entered in favour of the plaintiff against the government for Ksh.42,175 on 24th November 2021. More than 21 days had elapsed since the date of judgment, and the plaintiff had made a proper application for a certificate of order against the government as required by Section 21(1) of the Government Proceedings Act. The Attorney General, though served, did not oppose the application. The court was satisfied that all statutory requirements had been met and allowed the application, issuing the certificate as sought.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- A certificate of order against the government in the sum of Ksh.42,175 is issued to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CIVIL SUIT NO. 3008 OF 1989
HARTWELL J.M. MANZIGHE.....PLAINTIFF
-VERSUS-
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.....DEFENDANT
RULING
1. The plaintiff/applicant herein, took out the motion dated 2ndDecember 2021 whereof he sought to be issued with a certificate of order against the government in the execution of the decree. The plaintiff filed the affidavit he swore in support of the motion. The application was served upon the Hon. Attorney General but that never elicited any response hence the plaintiff/applicant was allowed to prosecute the motion exparte.
2. I have considered the grounds stated on the face of the motiondated 2nd December 2021 plus the facts deponed in the supporting affidavit. I have further considered the oral submissions made by learned counsel.
3. It is the averment of the applicant that judgment against thegovernment was delivered on 24th November 2021 and that execution cannot issue under Section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act unless a certificate of order against the Government is issued.
4. It is not in dispute that judgment in favour of the plaintiff andagainst the defendant in the sum of ksh.42,175/= was made on 24th November 2021.
5. Under section 21 (1) of the Government Proceedings Act, whereany order is made by any court in favour of any person against the government, a certificate in the prescribed form containing particulars of the order shall be issued upon an application made by a party at any time after the expiry of 21 days from the date of the order.
6. It is apparent that more than 21 days have since lapsed from thedate of judgement. I am satisfied that the plaintiff is entitled to the order sought. The motion dated 2. 12. 2021 is allowed. Consequently a certificate of order against the government in sum of ksh.42,175 is issued.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED ONLINE VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS AT NAIROBI THIS 18TH DAY OF
FEBRUARY, 2022
………….…………….
J. K. SERGON
JUDGE
In the presence of:
……………………………. for the Plaintiff
……………………………. for the Defendant