[2019] KEHC 12157 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 12157 (KLR)

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional. The petitioner, having served 10 years, demonstrated remorse, advanced age, and ill health. The court exercised its discretion to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 12157 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Harun Stephen Meshak; Respondent: The Director of Public Prosecutions
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 96 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
petition allowed in part; petitioner resentenced to time served and released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Mandatory Sentencing, Resentencing Guidelines, Robbery With Violence, Death Penalty, Penal Code Interpretation
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Mandatory Sentencing Resentencing Guidelines Robbery With Violence Death Penalty Penal Code Interpretation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Harun Stephen Meshak

Applicant

The Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence under Section 296(2) of the Penal Code is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing based on the period already served, age, health, and remorse.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional. The petitioner, having served 10 years, demonstrated remorse, advanced age, and ill health. The court exercised its discretion to resentence the petitioner to the period already served, holding that 10 years' imprisonment was sufficient punishment. Consequently, the petitioner was ordered to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.

Court Disposition

petition allowed in part; petitioner resentenced to time served and released unless otherwise lawfully held.

Orders

  • The petitioner is resentenced to 10 years served.
  • The petitioner is to be released and set free unless lawfully held for another cause.