[2012] KEHC 2958 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 2958 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case warranting further investigation and that the issues raised, including allegations of ulterior motives and abuse of process in the intended criminal proceedings, were serious and merited determination at the hearing of the main motion. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 2958 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hassan Aden Osman; Respondent: The Commissioner of Police; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: The Director of Public Prosecutions
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 274 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Leave Application and Interim Stay
Outcome
Leave granted to apply for judicial review; leave to operate as stay; directions for filing main motion and submissions.
Judges
MA Warsame
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Certiorari, Prohibition, Abuse of Process, Prosecutorial Discretion
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Criminal Law Judicial Review Certiorari Prohibition Abuse of Process Prosecutorial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hassan Aden Osman

Applicant

The Commissioner of Police

Respondent

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

The Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Leave Application and Interim Stay

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to the applicant to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition.
  2. 2 Whether the leave granted should operate as a stay of the decision to arrest and charge the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case warranting further investigation and that the issues raised, including allegations of ulterior motives and abuse of process in the intended criminal proceedings, were serious and merited determination at the hearing of the main motion. The court was satisfied that interim protection was necessary to preserve the applicant's position and prevent potential harm pending the outcome of the substantive application. Accordingly, leave was granted to apply for judicial review, and the leave was ordered to operate as a stay of the respondents' decision to arrest and charge the applicant until the main motion is heard and...

Court Disposition

Leave granted to apply for judicial review; leave to operate as stay; directions for filing main motion and submissions.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to apply for judicial review.
  • The leave granted shall operate as a stay of the respondents' decision to arrest and charge the applicant.