[2012] KEHC 14 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 14 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case as required for the grant of an interlocutory injunction. The defendants raised a serious challenge to the plaintiffs' title, undermining the plaintiffs' claim to the property. Furthermore, the court held that the balance of convenience...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 14 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Hassan Hashi Shirwa; Plaintiff: Omar Ali Hamed; Defendant: Swaleh Mohamed Saleh Mohamed; Defendant: Bakari Ali Mzee; Defendant: Omari Waziri; Defendant: Abdalla Waziri; Defendant: Ayubu Shekue; Defendant: Abdillahi Mohamed; Defendant: Abdalla Shee
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 41 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
CW Meoli
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Prima Facie Case, Title Disputes, Balance of Convenience
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Interlocutory Injunctions Prima Facie Case Title Disputes Balance of Convenience

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hassan Hashi Shirwa

Plaintiff

Omar Ali Hamed

Plaintiff

Swaleh Mohamed Saleh Mohamed

Defendant

Bakari Ali Mzee

Defendant

Omari Waziri

Defendant

Abdalla Waziri

Defendant

Ayubu Shekue

Defendant

Abdillahi Mohamed

Defendant

Abdalla Shee

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs have established a prima facie case to warrant the grant of an interlocutory injunction.
  2. 2 Whether damages would be an adequate remedy for the plaintiffs if the injunction is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the balance of convenience favours the plaintiffs or the defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case as required for the grant of an interlocutory injunction. The defendants raised a serious challenge to the plaintiffs' title, undermining the plaintiffs' claim to the property. Furthermore, the court held that the balance of convenience favoured the defendants, who were in possession of the suit property. As a result, the plaintiffs' application for an injunction was dismissed with costs to the defendants.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The plaintiffs' application for interlocutory injunction is dismissed with costs to the defendants.