[2011] KECA 302 (KLR)
The Court found that the notice of appeal was lodged within the 14-day period prescribed by Rule 75(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules, as the judgment was delivered on 3rd October, 2008 and the notice was lodged on 17th October, 2008. Applying Rule 3(a), the day of the judgment is excluded from the computation, making...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KECA 302 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Hebby Ondieki; Respondent: Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 372 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Legal Topics
- Notice of Appeal, Time Limitation, Court of Appeal Rules, Service of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hebby Ondieki
Applicant
Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notice of appeal was filed within the time prescribed by the Court of Appeal Rules.
- 2 Whether the notice of appeal was properly served on the applicant.
- 3 Whether the application to strike out the notice of appeal constitutes an abuse of court process.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the notice of appeal was lodged within the 14-day period prescribed by Rule 75(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules, as the judgment was delivered on 3rd October, 2008 and the notice was lodged on 17th October, 2008. Applying Rule 3(a), the day of the judgment is excluded from the computation, making the notice timely. The Court concluded that the application to strike out the notice of appeal was without merit and amounted to an abuse of the court process. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The applicant’s application dated 23rd November, 2009 is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAKURU
(CORAM: O’KUBASU, GITHINJI & NYAMU, JJ.A.)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 372 OF 2009
BETWEEN
HEBBY ONDIEKI .............................................................................................APPLICANT
AND
BARCLAYS BANK OF KENYA LIMITED ..................................................RESPONDENT
(Application to strike out notice of appeal dated 16th October, 2008 from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru
(Maraga, J.0 dated 3rd October, 2008
in
H.C.C.SUIT NO. 432 OF 1999)
****************
RULING OF THE COURT
This is an application by way of Notice of Motion brought under Rule 80 of the Court of Appeal Rules in which the applicant, HEBBY ONDIEKI seeks an order that the respondent’s notice of appeal dated 16th October, 2008 be struck out. It would appear that the application is brought on the grounds that the notice of appeal was filed out of time and that it was not served on the applicant.
When the application came up for hearing before us on24th February, 2011, Mr. G.O. Ogola, the learned counsel for the applicant, submitted that since the judgment of the superior court was delivered on 3rd October, 2008 and the notice of appeal was lodged on 17th October, 2008, then there was no competent notice of appeal before the Court.
In response to the foregoing Mr. Githiru, the learned counsel for the respondent, submitted that the notice of appeal was filed within time.
Rule 75(2) of this Court’s Rules provides:-
“Every such notice shall, subject to rules 84 and 97, be so lodged within fourteen days of the date the decision against which it is desired to appeal.”
From the foregoing, it is clear that a notice of appeal has to be lodged within 14 days of the date of the judgment/ruling to be challenged. In the present application, the judgment was delivered on 3rd October, 2008 and the notice of appeal lodged on 17th October, 2008. In our view, the notice of appeal was lodged within the time prescribed by the Rules.
Rule 3(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules provides:-
“3. Any period of time fixed by these Rules or by any decision of the Court for doing any act shall be reckoned in accordance with the following provisions-
(a)a period of days from the happening of an event or the doing of any act or thing shall be deemed to be exclusive of the day in which the event happens or that act or thing is done”
In view of the foregoing, it is clear to us that this application to strike out the notice of appeal is devoid of any merit. The application falls under the category of abuse of the court process. We have no hesitation in rejecting it.
Accordingly, the applicant’s application dated 23rd November, 2009 is hereby dismissed with costs to the respondent. It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Nakuru this 25th day of March, 2011.
E.O. O’KUBASU
....................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
E.M. GITHINJI
................…...............
JUDGE OF APPEAL
J.G. NYAMU
..................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this isa true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR