[2013] KEHC 4721 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had produced uncontroverted evidence of ownership, including a share certificate and a title deed, establishing her as the registered proprietor of the suit land. There was no evidence of any restrictions or encumbrances on the title. The defendant, having failed to appear or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 4721 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Hellen Nasambu Wanyonyi; Defendant: Wilberforce Ambwere
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 81 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Formal Proof After Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim allowed in part; eviction and injunction granted; general damages for trespass denied; costs awarded to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Land Ownership, Title Registration, Eviction, Trespass, Injunction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hellen Nasambu Wanyonyi
Plaintiff
Wilberforce Ambwere
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Formal Proof After Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is the registered and rightful owner of L.R. No. Kwanza/Namanjalala Block 5/175.
- 2 Whether the defendant is a trespasser on the suit land.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an eviction order and permanent injunction against the defendant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had produced uncontroverted evidence of ownership, including a share certificate and a title deed, establishing her as the registered proprietor of the suit land. There was no evidence of any restrictions or encumbrances on the title. The defendant, having failed to appear or contest the claim, was deemed a trespasser. The plaintiff was therefore entitled to exclusive possession, eviction of the defendant, and a permanent injunction restraining the defendant or any other persons from interfering with the land. However, the court declined to award general damages for trespass due to insufficient evidence regarding the extent of the defendant's activities...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim allowed in part; eviction and injunction granted; general damages for trespass denied; costs awarded to plaintiff.
Orders
- Plaintiff declared sole proprietor of L.R. No. Kwanza/Namanjalala Block 5/175.
- Defendant to be evicted from the suit land forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Kitale
Civil Suit 81 of 2012 [if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-US X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif]
HELEN NASAMBU WANYONYI ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PLAINTIFF.
VERSUS
WILBERFORCE AMBWERE ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: DEFENDANT.
J U D G M E N T.
The plaintiff Hellen Nasambu Wanyonyi brought this suit against the defendant Wilberforce Ambwere praying for a declaration that she is entitled to exclusive use and occupation of L.R. No. Kwanza/Namanjalala Block 5/175. She also prayed for an eviction order and permanent injunction restraining the defendant or any other persons from trespassing or in any way dealing with the suit land. She at the same time prayed for general damages for trespass and costs of the suit. The defendant who was duly served neither entered appearance nor filed defence. The plaintiff therefore obtained interlocutory judgment against him and the case proceeded by way of formal proof.
During the hearing the plaintiff testified that she bought the suit land from Trans Nzoia Investment Company Ltd and was duly issued with share certificate No. 7045 on 30/6/1992. She produced the share certificate as exhibit 1. She took possession of the land for which she was thereafter issued with a title deed produced as exhibit 2. In February, 2012 the defendant invaded her land and constructed a house thereon and started ploughing the land which he continues to do to date. This is why she has come to court seeking the prayers set out hereinabove in this judgment.
I have gone through the pleadings. The plaintiff's evidence remains uncontroverted. She has proved by evidence that she bought the land from Trans Nzoia Investments Ltd and was issued share certificate on 30/6/1992. She has further proved that subsequent to this, she had her land registered in her name and title thereof issued to her on 10/10/2011. Section 26 (1) of the Land Registration Act No. 3 of 2012 provides as follows:-
“The certificate of title issued by the Registrar upon
Registration or to a purchaser of land upon transfer
or transmission by a proprietor shall be taken by all
courts as prima facie evidence that the person named
as proprietor of the land is the absolute and indefeasible
owner subject to the incumberances, easements,
restrictions and conditions endorsed thereon.”
In the present case there was no evidence adduced to show whether there are any restrictions or endorsements on the title. I will therefore take it that it is the plaintiff who is the registered owner of the land and that neither restrictions nor conditions have been entered against the title. The question which then arises is as to whether the plaintiff has established her case on a balance of probabilities. The answer to this is that the plaintiff has proved her case on a balance of probabilities. She has proved that she has title to the land. It therefore follows that she is entitled to the exclusive use of the same. The defendant is a trespasser on to the land. The plaintiff is entitled to protection by the law. Though in her pleadings she has pleaded that the defendant invaded her land in May, 2012, in her evidence she testified that the invasion took place in February, 2012. This does not however affect her claim. The plaintiff did not come out clearly as to what the defendant is doing on the land save for saying that he has erected a structure on the land and has ploughed. I therefore do not have any basis upon which I can award general damages on trespass. I find that the plaintiff is the sole proprietor of land known as L.R. No. Kwanza/Namanjalala Block 5/175. The defendant should be evicted from the land forthwith and a permanent injunction is hereby issued restraining the defendant or any other persons from interfering and or dealing in any manner with the suit land. The plaintiff shall have costs of the suit.
[Dated, signed and delivered at Kitale on this 7th day of March, 2013. ]
E. OBAGA.
JUDGE.
[In the presence of Mr. Waweru for plaintiff, Court Clerk – Joan.]
E. OBAGA.
JUDGE.
[if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; text-autospace:ideograph-other; font-size:12. 0pt;"Liberation Serif","serif";} </style> <![endif]