[2018] KEELRC 846 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 846 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was unfairly terminated without notice or valid reason, contrary to sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007. The claims for underpayments, accrued leave, overtime, public holiday pay, house allowance, and other entitlements were particularised and supported by evidence, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 846 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Henry Meme Mworia; Respondent: Union Developers (K) Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 373 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
B Ongaya
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Underpayment of Wages, Overtime Claims, Annual Leave Entitlement, House Allowance, Statutory Compliance
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Underpayment of Wages Overtime Claims Annual Leave Entitlement House Allowance Statutory Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Henry Meme Mworia

Claimant

Union Developers (K) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly, unlawfully, and wrongfully terminated from employment.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to underpayments, accrued leave, overtime, pay for public holidays, damages, day rest, and unpaid house allowance as claimed.
  3. 3 Whether the claims are time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was unfairly terminated without notice or valid reason, contrary to sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007. The claims for underpayments, accrued leave, overtime, public holiday pay, house allowance, and other entitlements were particularised and supported by evidence, and the respondent did not dispute any aspect of the claim. The court held that the claims were not time-barred as they constituted continuing injury, ceasing only upon termination. The claimant was therefore entitled to the full amount claimed, and judgment was entered accordingly.

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.5,818,952.48 by 1 February 2019, failing which interest shall accrue at court rates from the date of suit until full payment.
  • The respondent shall pay the claimant's costs of the suit.