[2000] KEHC 342 (KLR)

[2000] KEHC 342 (KLR)

The court held that section 228 of the Companies Act is clear that once a winding-up order has been made or an interim liquidator appointed, no action or proceedings can be commenced or continued against the company except by leave of the court. Since the plaintiff commenced the proceedings without obtaining such...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KEHC 342 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Henry Njoroge; Defendant: Rural Urban Credit Finance Co. Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 1973 of 1986
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Notice of Motion
Outcome
suit struck out with costs to the respondent/defendant
Judges
JL Osiemo
Legal Topics
Company Liquidation, Leave of Court, Winding Up Orders
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Company Liquidation Leave of Court Winding Up Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Henry Njoroge

Plaintiff

Rural Urban Credit Finance Co. Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Notice of Motion

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff could proceed with the suit against the 1st defendant company in liquidation without obtaining leave of the court as required by section 228 of the Companies Act.
  2. 2 Whether proceedings commenced without such leave are invalid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that section 228 of the Companies Act is clear that once a winding-up order has been made or an interim liquidator appointed, no action or proceedings can be commenced or continued against the company except by leave of the court. Since the plaintiff commenced the proceedings without obtaining such leave, the suit was in contravention of the Companies Act and therefore invalid. The court struck out the suit with costs to the respondent/defendant.

Court Disposition

suit struck out with costs to the respondent/defendant

Orders

  • The suit is struck out with costs to the respondent/defendant.