[2020] KEELC 1516 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 1516 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants failed to comply with a lawful court order requiring them to file submissions in support of their application for enlargement of time and stay of execution. No alternative manner of disposing of the application was provided. As a result, the court dismissed the application dated...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 1516 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Henry Shikuku Barasa; Applicant: Joash Chimunge Waswa; Applicant: John Nyongesa Ngeywa; Applicant: Matisi Outreach Church; Respondent: Reuben Fwamba Mbita
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 3 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Enlargement of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
application dismissed for want of prosecution
Legal Topics
Enlargement of Time, Taxation of Costs, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Enlargement of Time Taxation of Costs Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Henry Shikuku Barasa

Applicant

Joash Chimunge Waswa

Applicant

John Nyongesa Ngeywa

Applicant

Matisi Outreach Church

Applicant

Reuben Fwamba Mbita

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Enlargement of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the court should enlarge time to file a reference against the taxing officer's decision.
  2. 2 Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to failure to file submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to comply with a lawful court order requiring them to file submissions in support of their application for enlargement of time and stay of execution. No alternative manner of disposing of the application was provided. As a result, the court dismissed the application dated 13/2/2020 for want of prosecution, emphasizing the necessity for parties to comply with procedural directions and actively prosecute their cases.

Court Disposition

application dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The application dated 13/2/2020 is dismissed for want of prosecution.