[2001] KECA 153 (KLR)

[2001] KECA 153 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal held that the judgment delivered by the Senior Resident Magistrate was a nullity as it was in breach of Order XX rule 2(2) and not authorised by Order 48 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Both parties agreed that the magistrate lacked jurisdiction to deliver the judgment in question. Consequently,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] KECA 153 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Herbert Asava; Appellant: Jacob Masinde Neyole; Appellant: Hezron Atsaya; Appellant: Ezekiel Wanyonyi; Appellant: Bethwell Alenga; Appellant: Japheth Nagaya; Appellant: Moses Mulele; Appellant: Hesbon O. Wendo; Appellant: Victor Shitoshe; Appellant: Tom Agweyu; Appellant: Alice Masilwa; Respondent: Timothy Bilindi; Respondent: Alexander Mudeki Masika; Respondent: Jestimore Webi
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 196 of ??
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Ruling and Order of the High Court at Busia
Outcome
appeal allowed
Judges
EO O'Kubasu
Legal Topics
Judgment Nullity, Jurisdiction of Magistrate, Order Xx Rule 2, Order 48 Civil Procedure Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Judgment Nullity Jurisdiction of Magistrate Order Xx Rule 2 Order 48 Civil Procedure Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Herbert Asava

Appellant

Jacob Masinde Neyole

Appellant

Hezron Atsaya

Appellant

Ezekiel Wanyonyi

Appellant

Bethwell Alenga

Appellant

Japheth Nagaya

Appellant

Moses Mulele

Appellant

Hesbon O. Wendo

Appellant

Victor Shitoshe

Appellant

Tom Agweyu

Appellant

Alice Masilwa

Appellant

Timothy Bilindi

Respondent

Alexander Mudeki Masika

Respondent

Jestimore Webi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Ruling and Order of the High Court at Busia

  1. 1 Whether the judgment delivered by a Senior Resident Magistrate was a nullity due to lack of jurisdiction under the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2 Whether Order XX rule 2(2) and Order 48 of the Civil Procedure Rules were breached.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the judgment delivered by the Senior Resident Magistrate was a nullity as it was in breach of Order XX rule 2(2) and not authorised by Order 48 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Both parties agreed that the magistrate lacked jurisdiction to deliver the judgment in question. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the impugned judgment was set aside, and the application in the superior court was dismissed with costs. The court emphasized the importance of adherence to procedural rules regarding the delivery of judgments and the jurisdiction of judicial officers.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed with costs.
  • The judgment appealed from is set aside.