[2014] KEELRC 372 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 372 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant's pleadings established the existence of a continuing injury or damage, as the respondent withheld the claimant's funds up to the time of filing the suit. Therefore, the matter falls within the exception for continuing injury under Section 90 of the Employment Act. The suit was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELRC 372 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Hesbone Gavunji Mafunya; Respondent: Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd.
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 691 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Limitation of Action Objection
Outcome
Objection on limitation dismissed; suit to proceed.
Legal Topics
Limitation Periods, Continuing Injury, Employment Termination, Employment Contracts
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation Periods Continuing Injury Employment Termination Employment Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hesbone Gavunji Mafunya

Claimant

Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Limitation of Action Objection

  1. 1 Whether the claim was filed within the limitation period prescribed under Section 90 of the Employment Act.
  2. 2 Whether the injury or damage alleged by the claimant constitutes a 'continuing injury' under Section 90 of the Employment Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant's pleadings established the existence of a continuing injury or damage, as the respondent withheld the claimant's funds up to the time of filing the suit. Therefore, the matter falls within the exception for continuing injury under Section 90 of the Employment Act. The suit was not time-barred and was properly before the court.

Court Disposition

Objection on limitation dismissed; suit to proceed.

Orders

  • The suit is not time-barred and will proceed to hearing.