[2022] KEELC 1390 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 1390 (KLR)

The court determined that the central issue requiring resolution is the precise location, size, and position of the disputed parcels of land—Land Reference No. FR. NO. 290/112 within Shanzu and Land Reference No. 10121/I/MN. Given the conflicting claims of ownership and occupation, and the existence of a prior...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 1390 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hezekiah Omondi Adara; Respondent: The Chief Land Registrar
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 33 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Post Judgment Directions Following Applications for Stay and Contempt
Outcome
Directions issued for comprehensive survey and report; matter stood over for mention and further orders.
Judges
LL Naikuni
Legal Topics
Land Ownership Dispute, Registration of Restrictions, Survey and Boundaries, Contempt of Court, Stay of Execution
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Land Ownership Dispute Registration of Restrictions Survey and Boundaries Contempt of Court Stay of Execution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hezekiah Omondi Adara

Applicant

The Chief Land Registrar

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Post Judgment Directions Following Applications for Stay and Contempt

  1. 1 Whether the restriction registered against Land Reference No. 10121/1/MN was lawful and justified.
  2. 2 Whether the decree for removal of the restriction should be stayed pending further proceedings.
  3. 3 Whether the Land Registrar is in contempt of court for failing to comply with the court's judgment and decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the central issue requiring resolution is the precise location, size, and position of the disputed parcels of land—Land Reference No. FR. NO. 290/112 within Shanzu and Land Reference No. 10121/I/MN. Given the conflicting claims of ownership and occupation, and the existence of a prior judgment and decree for removal of a restriction, the court found it necessary to direct a comprehensive historical and physical survey of the parcels. This would establish the factual basis for enforcement of its orders and clarify the rights of the parties. The court further held that all parties should be allowed to participate in the survey process and be furnished with the...

Court Disposition

Directions issued for comprehensive survey and report; matter stood over for mention and further orders.

Orders

  • The Deputy Registrar, Coastal Regional Land Surveyor, and all parties are directed to conduct a detailed historical background check and physical survey of Land Reference No. FR. NO. 290/112 within Shanzu and Land Reference No. 10121/I/MN.
  • A comprehensive survey report is to be prepared and submitted to the court by 31st March, 2022.