[2020] KEHC 190 (KLR)
The court determined that M/s Mwangi Ruita & Company, having served as the 4th defendant's auditor for 15 years and having been listed as a defense witness, could not be considered impartial or independent for the purposes of the audit required by the mediation settlement. The 3rd defendant withdrew his proposal, leaving M/s Kinyori & Associates as the only remaining candidate. Upon review of their credentials and testimonials, the court found M/s Kinyori & Associates to possess the necessary experience and expertise to conduct the audit. The overriding consideration was the need for an independent and impartial audit to give effect to the mediation settlement and ensure fairness among...
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 190 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Hezekiah Wan’gombe Gichohi; Plaintiff: Hezy John Limited; Plaintiff: Allimex Limited; Plaintiff: HII Investors; Plaintiff: Caroline W Kamaru; Defendant: David N Muthoga; Defendant: Antony Wagura Ikiki; Defendant: Peter Gichohi Gitau; Defendant: Umoja Service Stations Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2020
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 13 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Appointment of Auditor Following Mediation Settlement
- Outcome
- application for appointment of auditor allowed; M/s Kinyori & Associates appointed as auditors
- Judges
- A Mshila
- Legal Topics
- Company Dissolution, Appointment of Auditor, Share Audit, Mediation Settlement
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hezekiah Wan’gombe Gichohi
Plaintiff
Hezy John Limited
Plaintiff
Allimex Limited
Plaintiff
HII Investors
Plaintiff
Caroline W Kamaru
Plaintiff
David N Muthoga
Defendant
Antony Wagura Ikiki
Defendant
Peter Gichohi Gitau
Defendant
Umoja Service Stations Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Appointment of Auditor Following Mediation Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should appoint an independent auditor to audit the 4th defendant company as per the mediation settlement agreement.
- 2 Which audit firm is best suited to conduct an impartial and independent audit of the company’s shares.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that M/s Mwangi Ruita & Company, having served as the 4th defendant's auditor for 15 years and having been listed as a defense witness, could not be considered impartial or independent for the purposes of the audit required by the mediation settlement. The 3rd defendant withdrew his proposal, leaving M/s Kinyori & Associates as the only remaining candidate. Upon review of their credentials and testimonials, the court found M/s Kinyori & Associates to possess the necessary experience and expertise to conduct the audit. The overriding consideration was the need for an independent and impartial audit to give effect to the mediation settlement and ensure fairness among...
Court Disposition
application for appointment of auditor allowed; M/s Kinyori & Associates appointed as auditors
Orders
- The firm of M/s Kinyori & Associates is appointed as auditors to conduct the audit of the 4th defendant company.
- Parties are at liberty to apply for further directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment