[2021] KEELC 3276 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3276 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was an employee of the respondent and was terminated without any valid reason or adherence to fair procedure as required by the Employment Act. The respondent failed to appear or defend the claim, and there was no evidence to justify the termination. The court held that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 3276 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Hezekiel Muturi Kungu; Respondent: B.O.M Laikipia West District Public Hospital
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 206 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant; termination declared unfair; monetary awards granted.
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Summary Dismissal, Statutory Entitlements, Overtime Pay, Underpayment of Wages
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Summary Dismissal Statutory Entitlements Overtime Pay Underpayment of Wages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hezekiel Muturi Kungu

Claimant

B.O.M Laikipia West District Public Hospital

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's termination was unfair and unlawful under the Employment Act.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair termination, notice pay, service pay, overtime, and underpaid wages.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent failed to follow due process in terminating the claimant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was an employee of the respondent and was terminated without any valid reason or adherence to fair procedure as required by the Employment Act. The respondent failed to appear or defend the claim, and there was no evidence to justify the termination. The court held that the termination was unfair under Section 45(2) of the Employment Act. The claimant was awarded one month's salary in lieu of notice, eight months' compensation for unfair termination, underpayment of wages for three years, overtime pay for three years, and service pay for seven years, less statutory deductions. The respondent was also ordered to pay costs and interest.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant; termination declared unfair; monetary awards granted.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant KES 8,873 as one month's salary in lieu of notice.
  • Respondent to pay claimant KES 70,984 as compensation for unfair termination (8 months).