[2019] KEHC 8650 (KLR)
The court held that the Sexual Offences Act expressly provides for a minimum sentence of ten years imprisonment for the offence of rape, leaving no discretion to impose a lesser or non-custodial sentence. The applicant's health conditions, while noted, do not provide a legal basis for departing from the statutory...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 8650 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Hezron Ogolla Odhiambo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 1 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Review
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Review, Sexual Offences, Minimum Sentencing, Non Custodial Sentence, Health Grounds, Malicious Damage
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hezron Ogolla Odhiambo
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can review and substitute a custodial sentence for a non-custodial sentence in respect of a conviction for rape under section 3(1) of the Sexual Offences Act.
- 2 Whether the applicant's health condition justifies a review of sentence below the statutory minimum.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Sexual Offences Act expressly provides for a minimum sentence of ten years imprisonment for the offence of rape, leaving no discretion to impose a lesser or non-custodial sentence. The applicant's health conditions, while noted, do not provide a legal basis for departing from the statutory minimum. The court further found that the proper avenue for challenging the sentence would have been by way of appeal, not revision, as the sentence imposed was lawful and within the statutory framework. Accordingly, the application for revision lacked merit and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for revision of sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU
(CORAM: CHERERE-J)
CRIMINAL REVISION NUMBER 1 OF 2019
IN THE MATTER OF REVIEW OF SENTENCE UNDER SECTION 354, 364 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE CAP. 75 LAWS OF KENYA
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 23 (2) AND 50 (2) (p) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, 2010
BETWEEN
HEZRON OGOLLA ODHIAMBO..................................APPLICANT
AND
REPUBLIC.....................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
BACKGROUND
1. The Applicant’s conviction and sentence to 10 years for the offence of rape contrary to section 3(1) (a) and (c) of the Sexual Offences Act and 6 months for malicious damage to property contrary to section 339(1) of the Penal Code passed in Criminal Case No. 481 of 2014 Principal’s Magistrates Court at Maseno was upheld in Kisumu Criminal Appeal 39 of 2015(Hezron Ogola Odhiambo v Republic [2016] eKLR).
2. By an application filed on 9th January, 2019, the Applicant seeks for review of his sentence urging the court to grant him a non-custodial sentence.
3. The application is supported by the Applicant’s affidavit in which he avers that he suffers from chronic ulcers and diabetes. In support thereof, he has attached treatment records from Jaramogi Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital.
4. Mr. Muia for the state opposed the application and urged that the Applicant has a right of appeal if he is dissatisfied by the court order that affirmed his sentence.
5. Section 3 of the Sexual Offences under which the Applicant was convicted in the 1st count provides as follows:-
(1) A person commits the offence termed rape if—
(a) he or she intentionally and unlawfully commits an act which causes penetration with his or her genital organs;
(b) the other person does not consent to the penetration; or
(c) the consent is obtained by force or by means of threats or intimidation of any kind.
(3) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable upon conviction to imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years but which may be enhanced to imprisonment for life
6. The foregoing section leaves no doubt in the mind of the court that its drafters did not intend that anyone convicted of the offence of rape would be sentenced to any sentence less than 10 years let alone a non-custodial sentence.
7. Consequently, the application for revision is considered and found to have no merit and it is dismissed.
DATED AND DELIVERED IN KISUMU THIS 28th DAY OF March2019
T.W. CHERERE
JUDGE
Delivered in open court in the presence of-
Court Assistants - Felix
Applicant - Present
For the Applicant - Mr Odeny/Mirembe
For the Respondent - Mr Muia