[2017] KEHC 8665 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 8665 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent, having been allocated and become the owner of Parcel No. Muguga/Kanyariri/3100, had no right to continue occupying Parcel No. Muguga/Kanyariri/3099, which was to be sold and the proceeds shared among all beneficiaries as per the certificate of confirmation of grant. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 8665 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hilda Waithera Mugo; Respondent: John Gitagia Mugo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1875 of 1998
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Post Confirmation Summons for Eviction
Outcome
Application allowed. Eviction order granted against respondent.
Judges
AO Muchelule, REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Succession Distribution, Eviction of Beneficiary, Confirmation of Grant, Administration of Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession Distribution Eviction of Beneficiary Confirmation of Grant Administration of Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hilda Waithera Mugo

Applicant

John Gitagia Mugo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Post Confirmation Summons for Eviction

  1. 1 Whether the respondent should be evicted from land Parcel No. Muguga/Kanyariri/3099 as per the confirmed grant.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to remain on Parcel No. Muguga/Kanyariri/3099 after being allocated Parcel No. Muguga/Kanyariri/3100.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent, having been allocated and become the owner of Parcel No. Muguga/Kanyariri/3100, had no right to continue occupying Parcel No. Muguga/Kanyariri/3099, which was to be sold and the proceeds shared among all beneficiaries as per the certificate of confirmation of grant. The respondent's continued occupation was contrary to the court's orders. The court exercised its inherent powers to enforce compliance with its orders, granting the application for eviction and providing a sixty-day period for voluntary vacation, failing which forcible eviction would be carried out at the respondent's expense.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Eviction order granted against respondent.

Orders

  • The respondent is given sixty (60) days to vacate land Parcel No. Muguga/Kanyariri/3099.
  • If the respondent fails to vacate within sixty (60) days, he shall be forcefully evicted from the property.