[2013] KEHC 1358 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant's plea of guilty was unequivocal and voluntary, as the proceedings were conducted in a language he understood and he confessed more than once before the trial court. There was no evidence of coercion or misunderstanding. The conviction was therefore proper, and the sentence of life...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 1358 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Hillary Kipkoech Ngetich; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 71 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld
- Judges
- B Ongaya
- Legal Topics
- Defilement, Sexual Offences Act, Plea of Guilty, Sentencing, Appeal Against Conviction, Life Imprisonment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hillary Kipkoech Ngetich
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's plea of guilty was voluntary and unequivocal.
- 2 Whether the conviction and sentence were proper in law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant's plea of guilty was unequivocal and voluntary, as the proceedings were conducted in a language he understood and he confessed more than once before the trial court. There was no evidence of coercion or misunderstanding. The conviction was therefore proper, and the sentence of life imprisonment was in accordance with the law for the offence of defilement under the Sexual Offences Act. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The conviction is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERICHO
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 71 OF 2012
(Being an Appeal Against the Original Conviction and Sentence by the Honourable J.Kwena , Senior PrincipalMagistrate at
Bomet in Criminal Case No. 29 of 2012 in the Judgment Delivered on 9. 10. 2012)
HILLARY KIPKOECH NGETICH......................................APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
REPUBLIC....................................................................RESPONDENT
(Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya Thursday 24th October, 2013)
JUDGMENT
The appellant is Hillary Kipkoech Ngetich. He was charged with the offence of defilement contrary to section 8(1) as read with section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act No.3 of 2006. He was convicted as charged upon his own plea of guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment.
The appellant has appealed against the conviction and sentence. To urge his case, he submitted to this court as follows:
The village elders and the police officers misled him to plead guilty to the offence.
He prayed for leniency and did not know the harsh consequences of committing the offence and pleading guilty as charged.
He served as a casual worker in the home of the complainant and there were differences leading to the charges.
Counsel for the respondent Mrs. Muthee submitted that the appellant committed the offence as charged as it was clear that he committed the offence because he repeatedly told the trial court he committed the offence and the prosecution proved the case beyond any reasonable doubt.
This court has considered the submissions and perused the record of the trial court. There is no reasonable doubt that the appellant committed the offence. The proceedings were in Kipsigis language that the appellant understood. The appellant confessed before the trial court more than once that he had committed the offence.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, the conviction is upheld and the appellant shall serve life imprisonment as sentenced by the honourable trial court.
Signed, datedanddeliveredin court atKerichothisThursday, 24th October, 2013.
BYRAM ONGAYA
JUDGE