[2021] KEHC 8754 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 8754 (KLR)

The court found that although there was a significant delay of about two and a half years in filing the appeal, the applicant had provided sufficient reasons for the delay, including lack of legal knowledge and resources. In the interest of justice and pursuant to Article 48 of the Constitution, the court granted...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 8754 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hippalus Mbasu Lei; Respondent: Republic of Kenya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 451 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and for Pauper Status
Outcome
Application partly allowed.
Judges
GL Nzioka
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Pauper Brief, Sexual Offences Appeal, Access to Justice
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Pauper Brief Sexual Offences Appeal Access to Justice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hippalus Mbasu Lei

Applicant

Republic of Kenya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and for Pauper Status

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal against conviction and sentence out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be allowed to prosecute the appeal as a pauper without paying court fees.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant should be supplied with trial court proceedings and judgment to prepare further grounds and submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although there was a significant delay of about two and a half years in filing the appeal, the applicant had provided sufficient reasons for the delay, including lack of legal knowledge and resources. In the interest of justice and pursuant to Article 48 of the Constitution, the court granted leave to file the appeal out of time. However, the court found no evidence to support the applicant's claim of inability to pay court fees and therefore declined to grant pauper status unless further evidence was provided.

Court Disposition

Application partly allowed.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file an appeal out of time.
  • The request to prosecute the appeal as a pauper is disallowed unless further evidence is adduced.