[2022] KEHC 15969 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 15969 (KLR)

The High Court found no error in the subordinate court's conclusion that the respondent had proved its claim for the outstanding contract sum. The respondent's invoices were deemed to reflect the final negotiated agreement between the parties, and there was evidence that these invoices had been forwarded to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 15969 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Homeboyz Entertainment Limited; Respondent: Total Stewards Services Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E095 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Judges
DAS Majanja
Legal Topics
Contract Enforcement, Oral Contracts, Payment Disputes
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Contract Enforcement Oral Contracts Payment Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Homeboyz Entertainment Limited

Appellant

Total Stewards Services Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the subordinate court erred in finding that the respondent had proved its claim for the outstanding contract sum on a balance of probabilities.
  2. 2 Whether the invoices produced by the respondent constituted the final agreement between the parties and were due and payable.
  3. 3 Whether the High Court, limited to matters of law, could interfere with the subordinate court's factual findings.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found no error in the subordinate court's conclusion that the respondent had proved its claim for the outstanding contract sum. The respondent's invoices were deemed to reflect the final negotiated agreement between the parties, and there was evidence that these invoices had been forwarded to the appellant. The appellant's denial of receipt was contradicted by correspondence and admissions regarding the negotiation of services as per the quotations. The High Court, limited to matters of law, could not interfere with the subordinate court's factual findings in the absence of perversity. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed as lacking merit.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent assessed at Kshs 20,000.00.
  • The judgment of the Small Claims Court awarding Kshs 465,160.00 to the respondent is upheld.