[2012] KEHC 3961 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had proved its case on a balance of probability, as the evidence established that the defendants were not legitimate directors or members of the plaintiff company and had no authority to interfere with its management or property. The official company register and testimony from the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 3961 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Homeway Poultry Farm Ltd; Defendant: John Mutunga Mwangi; Defendant: Pascalina Nyokabi; Defendant: Charles Muhoro Ngare; Defendant: Elijah Sekah; Defendant: Moses Oloo Winga; Defendant: James Gichuru; Defendant: Esther Wambui
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 556 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof, Default of Appearance
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff as prayed in the plaint. Costs awarded to the plaintiff.
- Judges
- C.N Mutava
- Legal Topics
- Company Directorship Disputes, Shareholder Rights, Land Ownership, Corporate Governance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Homeway Poultry Farm Ltd
Plaintiff
John Mutunga Mwangi
Defendant
Pascalina Nyokabi
Defendant
Charles Muhoro Ngare
Defendant
Elijah Sekah
Defendant
Moses Oloo Winga
Defendant
James Gichuru
Defendant
Esther Wambui
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof, Default of Appearance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants were lawfully directors of the plaintiff company.
- 2 Whether the defendants unlawfully interfered with the management and property of the plaintiff company.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dealing with the company or its property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had proved its case on a balance of probability, as the evidence established that the defendants were not legitimate directors or members of the plaintiff company and had no authority to interfere with its management or property. The official company register and testimony from the Assistant Registrar of Companies confirmed the legitimate list of directors as at 2nd November 2011. The defendants failed to enter appearance or contest the suit, and the plaintiff’s evidence was uncontroverted. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dealing with the company or its property, and a declaration...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff as prayed in the plaint. Costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Orders
- A permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from undertaking or dealing in any way with the plaintiff’s property and from holding themselves out as directors of the plaintiff or interfering with the management of the plaintiff.
- A declaration that the list of directors indicated in the company’s register as at 2nd November 2011 is the legitimate list of directors of the company and any purported removal is null and void.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT
AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
Civil Suit 556 of 2011
HOMEWAY POULTRY FARM LTD.....................................................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
JOHN MUTUNGA MWANGI...................................................................................1STDEFENDANT
PASCALINA NYOKABI.........................................................................................2ND DEFENDANT
CHARLES MUHORO NGARE.............................................................................3RD DEFENDANT
ELIJAH SEKAH.....................................................................................................4TH DEFENDANT
MOSES OLOO WINGA......................................................................................5TH DEFENDANT
JAMES GICHURU..............................................................................................6TH DEFENDANT
ESTHER WAMBUI.............................................................................................7TH DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
1. By a Plaint filed on 9th December 2011, the Plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the Defendants and each of them from undertaking or dealing in any way with the plaintiff’s property and from holding themselves out as directors of the Plaintiff or conducting meetings of the Plaintiff or interfering with the management of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff also sought a declaration that the list of directors indicated in the company’s register as at 2nd November 2011 be deemed as the legitimate list of directors of the company and that any purported removal be declared null and void.
2. Contemporaneous with the Plaint, the Plaintiff filed an application for interlocutory injunction orders restraining the Defendants from undertaking or dealing in any way with the plaintiff company and from holding themselves out as directors of the company. The application was heard inter partes on 17th January 2012 and a ruling delivered on 23rd February 2012 in which this court granted the said injunction orders pending hearing and determination of the suit.
3. Summons to enter appearance were served upon the Defendants on 6th March 2012 but the Defendants failed to enter appearance. The Plaintiff then filed a Request for Judgment in default of appearance which request was allowed by the court and interlocutory judgment entered on 20th April 2012. The matter was then fixed for formal proof on 16th May 2012.
4. The Plaintiff called two witnesses during the formal proof.
5. Plaintiff Witness No. 1 was Mr. Wilson Rading the Assistant Registrar of Companies and a State Counsel in the Registrar of Companies’ Department. In his evidence, Mr. Radingstaed that he was in Possession Company of the file of Homeway Poultry Farm Limited and had on 2nd November, 2011, issued a list of directors in a letter dated the same day. 2nd November, 2011. From the letter, he confirmed that the Company was registered on 27th June, 1973. The last returns made for the company was in the year 2009. According to the return, the details of directors remained the same as those indicated in his letter of 2nd November, 2011. He dismissed a rival list of directors contained in a letter dated 16th May, 2011 purportedly issued from his office stating that the names in that list did not tally with the list of directors in the company file.
6. Plaintiff witness No, 2 was Ms. WanjiruMbuthia. Ms. Mbuthia testified that she was a founder director ofthe Plaintiff company and its chairperson. She was among the subscribers to the company at the time of its registration as a company in the year 1973. She told the court that the original members of the company were seven but that some members had since died. The members currently registered as directors were Esther Wambui, James Gichuru,KariukiTherenja,Stephen Mbote,Joseph Mungati,Gladys Kabiru and herself. She testified that sometime in the year 2011, some people including the defendants invaded the Plaintiff’s farm L.R. No. 10389 Nairobi and purported to take over the company and its land. These were instigated by the then company secretary of the Plaintiff a Mr. Gichuru who purported to sell some plots of members to the non-members. The matter was reported to the chief and to the police. After she reported Mr. Gichuru to the chief, he stole the register of members and hid it. She called a meeting where of the company to discuss his conduct after which he was removed as company secretary. After his removal, he started a campaign to remove other directors from their positions in the company. He did not succeed as he was suspended as a secretary and the persons he was mobilizing could not believe him. The chief ordered him to return the register. She testified that the defendants John MutungaMwangi, James Gichuru, Esther Wambui, PascaliaNyokabi, MuhoroNgare, Elijah Sekah, and OlooWingawere not members of the company.Esther Wambuiwas a director but left the board without notifying other director. The said defendants had never been elected as officials of the company. She had been chairlady of the company from 1973 upto now and no meeting had ever been held to elect them. The said persons were farm intruders and thieves seeking to grab plots of weak members and those who died. She urged the court to order that they be removed from the farm. She confirmed further that the company was in the process of finalizing surveying of the land after which titles to members would be issued.
7. I have carefully considered the pleadings, the affidavit evidence on record and the oral evidence of the Plaintiff’s witnesses. I have also considered the written submissions by counsel for the Plaintiff.
8. On the strength of the evidence placed before me, and in the light of the Plaintiff’s case in this matter being wholly undefended, I am satisfied that on a balance of probability, the Plaintiff has proved its case as against the Defendants.
9. I am therefore inclined to enter judgment in favour of the Plaintiff as prayed in the Plaint. I further award costs of this suit to the Plaintiff.
10. These shall be the orders of the court.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN NAIROBI THIS 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2012.
J.M. MUTAVA
JUDGE