[2014] KEELRC 408 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 408 (KLR)

The Court held that the particulars sought by the 2nd Interested Party were not relevant or necessary for the determination of the appeal, as the only issue before the Court was whether there existed a registered trade union sufficiently representative of the interests for which the Appellants sought registration....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELRC 408 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Hon. Justus Aloo Ageka, Ouma Juma, Sebastian Ngorwe, Richard Ongoro, Mark Amimo, Monica Kendi, Nancy Jeruto (as Interim Officials of Kenya National Union of Cooperatives Staff); Respondent: Registrar of Trade Unions; Interested Party: Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers; Interested Party: Banking Insurance and Finance Union (K)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 1 'A' of 2012
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Further Particulars
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the appellants
Judges
L Ndolo, MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Trade Union Registration, Right to Information, Sectoral Representativity, Appeals From Registrar, Union Membership Requirements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Trade Union Registration Right to Information Sectoral Representativity Appeals From Registrar Union Membership Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hon. Justus Aloo Ageka, Ouma Juma, Sebastian Ngorwe, Richard Ongoro, Mark Amimo, Monica Kendi, Nancy Jeruto (as Interim Officials of Kenya National Union of Cooperatives Staff)

Appellant

Registrar of Trade Unions

Respondent

Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers

Interested Party

Banking Insurance and Finance Union (K)

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Further Particulars

  1. 1 Whether the 2nd Interested Party is entitled to further particulars from the Appellants regarding officials and members of the proposed union for purposes of responding to the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the particulars sought are relevant or necessary for the determination of the appeal against the Registrar of Trade Unions' decision declining registration.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the particulars sought by the 2nd Interested Party were not relevant or necessary for the determination of the appeal, as the only issue before the Court was whether there existed a registered trade union sufficiently representative of the interests for which the Appellants sought registration. The Court found no indication that the Appellants failed to comply with any formal requirements for registration or that the Registrar's decision was based on lack of particulars. The application for further particulars was therefore dismissed, as the information sought pertained to inquiries that should have been made before the Registrar or National Labour Board, not at the...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the appellants

Orders

  • The 2nd Interested Party's application for further particulars is dismissed with costs to the Appellants.
  • The Respondent and the 1st and 2nd Interested Parties are directed to file their respective responses to the Appellants' appeal within 14 days from the date of delivery of this ruling.