[2021] KECPT 561 (KLR)

[2021] KECPT 561 (KLR)

The tribunal found that the elections held on 31.5.2019 did not meet the required threshold for validity due to lack of proper vetting of members, failure to achieve quorum as stipulated in the by-laws, and procedural irregularities including the presence of only one co-operative officer and disruptions during the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECPT 561 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hosea Barmao Chemweno; Applicant: Samuel Chilia Saikwa; Respondent: Raymond Kipkorir Cheruiyot; Respondent: William Kigen; Respondent: Daniel Kindagor
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 316 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed in part
Legal Topics
Cooperative Societies Governance, Election Validity, Members Rights, Annual General Meeting, Financial Disclosure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Cooperative Societies Governance Election Validity Members Rights Annual General Meeting Financial Disclosure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hosea Barmao Chemweno

Applicant

Samuel Chilia Saikwa

Applicant

Raymond Kipkorir Cheruiyot

Respondent

William Kigen

Respondent

Daniel Kindagor

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the elections held on 31.5.2019 for Ngenda Investment Rural Co-operative Limited were valid.
  2. 2 Whether the delegates who participated in the meeting were bona fide members of the society.
  3. 3 Who are the legitimate officials of Ngenda Investment Rural Co-operative Limited.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the elections held on 31.5.2019 did not meet the required threshold for validity due to lack of proper vetting of members, failure to achieve quorum as stipulated in the by-laws, and procedural irregularities including the presence of only one co-operative officer and disruptions during the meeting. The tribunal determined that it was not possible to establish whether all delegates were bona fide members, rendering the election process fundamentally flawed. Consequently, the tribunal declared the elections null and void, ordered the reinstatement of officials who were in office prior to 31.5.2019, and directed that a fresh election be conducted under the...

Court Disposition

claim allowed in part

Orders

  • The elections carried out on 31.5.2019 are declared null and void.
  • Officials who were in office before 31.5.2019 to continue in office until a fresh election is carried out.