[2000] KEHC 219 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant, being a juvenile aged 17, was wrongly sentenced to imprisonment with hard labour. The trial magistrate erred by not considering the appellant's age and the legal requirement to treat juveniles differently from adult offenders. After reviewing the probation officer's report and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] KEHC 219 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Hosea Kiuna Wanjiru; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 822 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment and Subsequent Probation Order
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentence set aside; appellant placed on probation for two years, later extended by six months due to default.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing of Juveniles, Probation Orders, Plea of Guilty, Rape Offences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hosea Kiuna Wanjiru
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment and Subsequent Probation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on a juvenile convicted of rape was appropriate under the law.
- 2 Whether the appellant, having pleaded guilty, could appeal against conviction or sentence.
- 3 Whether the appellant should be placed on probation given his age and circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant, being a juvenile aged 17, was wrongly sentenced to imprisonment with hard labour. The trial magistrate erred by not considering the appellant's age and the legal requirement to treat juveniles differently from adult offenders. After reviewing the probation officer's report and considering the appellant's health and family circumstances, the court determined that probation was the appropriate sentence. The original custodial sentence was set aside, and the appellant was placed on probation for two years, later extended by six months due to default, with supervision by the probation officer. The court emphasized the importance of compliance with probation...
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentence set aside; appellant placed on probation for two years, later extended by six months due to default.
Orders
- The sentence of seven years imprisonment with hard labour is set aside.
- The appellant is placed on probation for two years under the supervision of the Probation Officer, Nairobi.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
39 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 822 OF 1999
(From Original Conviction and Sentence in the Criminal Case No. 1793 of
1999 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kikuyu:D.S. Ole Tukai)
HOSEA KIUNA WANJIRU……………………………....APPELLANT
V E R S U S
REPUBLIC………………………………………………RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
The Appellant Hosea Kiuna Wanjiru was convicted of plea of guilty to the offence of alleged rape contrary to section 141 of the Penal Code by the trial 1st Class District Republic, Kikuyu upon his conviction, he was sentenced to serve seven years imprisonment with hard labour. His appeal to this court is against conviction and sentence.
I have perused the record of the court below and I am satisfied that the Appellant who is now aged 17 years, was convicted on his own unequivocal plea of guilty to the charge. Accordingly no appeal against conviction conviction has come to this court by virtue of section 348 of the Criminal Procedure Code except on sentence. I dismiss his appeal against conviction.
As for the sentence that was imposed, I am satisfied that the Appellant being a Juvenile did not deserve committal to main prison. He ought to have been treated as a young offender. The learned trial Magistrate was there fore in error regarding his sentencing approach. I therefore set aside the sentence that was imposed upon him.
Having now called for social background report from the Probation Officer and perused his report, and having seen the Appellant who appears sickly and has been admitted at K.N.H for the last three months, I consider that this is a suitable case where the Appellant is likely to benefit from Supervision on probation.
I am glad that both the mother and uncle of the appellant, I believe that with their concerned effort under the guidance of the Probation Officer the Appellant come become a good boy and useful member of the Kenyan Society.
I therefore order that the Appellant be placed on probation for a period of two (2) years from the date hereof. He will be supervised by the Probation Officer Nairobi. He will abide by the terms of public order which I have personally explained to him. It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 11th day of April, 2000.
S. O OGUK
JUDGE
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 822 OF 1999
(From Original Conviction and Sentence in the Criminal Case No. 1793 of
1999 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kikuyu:D.S. Ole Tukai)
HOSEA KIUNA WANJIRU……………………………....APPELLANT
V E R S U S
REPUBLIC………………………………………………RESPONDENT
O R D E R
This court on the 11th of April, 2000 released the
Respondent(Appellant) on probation for a period of 2 years. He reported regularly to the Probation Officer, Limuru till December, 2000 when they were evicted from the forest where they used to stay. He then shifted to Maela without informing the Probation Officer. He was later re-arrested by the Police and brought to this court.
I understand the predicament of the accused person since his family is landless, but he is under duty at all times to notify the Probation Officer of his difficulties and personal calamities. I sympathize with him but I cannot entertain any default in the terms of the Probation Order. I caution him to be of good behaviour.
I re-instate his sentence on probation of this court and release him to go and report to the Probation Officer, Limuru. This period of probation will now be extended by a further 6 months since he has been in default since December, 2000.
It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 14th day of May 2000.
S.O.OGUK
JUDGE
Court:
A copy of this amended order to be supplied to the Probation Officer.