[2017] KEHC 843 (KLR)
The court found that the issue of the constitutionality of the Murang’a County Finance Act, 2013, specifically regarding public participation, had already been determined in Murang’a High Court Constitutional Petition No 24 of 2014. In that case, the court held that there was indeed public participation before the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 843 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Hosea Mwangi Kagumo; Applicant: Charles Kamau; Applicant: Mary Muthoni Gichuhi; Respondent: County Government of Murang’a
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Murang'a
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition 5 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- DW Mbuteti
- Legal Topics
- Public Participation, County Legislation, Cess and Levies, Constitutional Validity
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hosea Mwangi Kagumo
Applicant
Charles Kamau
Applicant
Mary Muthoni Gichuhi
Applicant
County Government of Murang’a
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Murang’a County Finance Act, 2013 is unconstitutional for want of public participation before its enactment.
- 2 Whether the issue of constitutionality of the Murang’a County Finance Act, 2013 can be relitigated after having been previously determined.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the issue of the constitutionality of the Murang’a County Finance Act, 2013, specifically regarding public participation, had already been determined in Murang’a High Court Constitutional Petition No 24 of 2014. In that case, the court held that there was indeed public participation before the enactment of the Act. As such, the court held that it would not permit the same issue to be litigated again in the present petition. Consequently, the application seeking to restrain the respondent from enforcing the new cess/levy was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The notice of motion dated 09/09/2014 is dismissed.
- Costs shall abide disposal of the petition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A
CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO 5 OF 2014
(FORMERLY NAIROBI HC CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO 446 OF
2014)
1. HOSEA MWANGI KAGUMO
2. CHARLES KAMAU
3. MARY MUTHONI GICHUHI
(Suing as Chairman, Secretary andTreasurer of
Samakake Welfare TransportersAssociation.....................PETITIONERS
VERSUS
COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF MURANG’A..............RESPONDFENT
R U L I N G
1. In their petition dated 09/09/2014 the Petitioners herein challenge the new cess or levy of KShs 500/00 per lorry (up from KShs 200/00) charged them by the Respondent, the County Government of Murang’a, on transport “of sand, stones, ballast, clay, hard-core, timber, poles, rafts, manure, firewood and scrap metal” within the County of Murang’a upon the ground that the Murang’a County Finance Act, 2013 under which the new cess/levy is charged is unconstitutional for want of public participation before its enactment. That petition is pending disposal.
2. Together with the petition the Petitioners filed notice of motion dated 09/09/2014seeking the main order to restrain the Respondent from enforcing the new cess/levy pending disposal of the petition.
3. The Respondent has opposed the application upon the main ground that the issue of the constitutionality of the Murang’a County Finance Act, 2013has been litigated upon before and decided, and that therefore it cannot be litigated again.
4. The application was canvassed by way of written submissions. The Petitioners’ submissions were filed on 06/06/2016 while those of the Respondent were filed on 28/09/2016. On 21/11/2016 the parties’ learned counsels informed the court that they did not wish to highlight. The judge was away on his annual leave from early December 2016 to mid-February 2017; hence the delay in preparation and delivery of this ruling.
5. I have considered the submissions of the parties. Indeed in Murang’a High Court Constitutional Petition No 24 of 2014 this very court was faced with the same issue of the constitutionality or otherwise of the Murang’a County Finance Act, 2013 which was challenged upon the same main ground of lack of public participation before its enactment. In a judgment delivered on 22/05/2015 this court found that there was indeed public participation before enactment of the Act. It is unlikely that this court will permit litigation of the same issue in the present petition.
6. In the circumstances I decline to grant the orders sought in the notice of motion dated 09/09/2014. The same is hereby dismissed. It is so ordered. Costs shall abide disposal of the petition.
DATED AND SIGNED AT MURANG’A THIS 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2017
H P G WAWERU
JUDGE
DELIVERED AT MURANG’A THIS 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2017