[2020] KEHC 10149 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 10149 (KLR)

The court found that, due to the absence of the parties' written submissions on the e-filing platform, it could not proceed to consider or determine the appeal on its merits. In the interest of justice and to ensure a fair hearing, the court exercised its discretion to set aside the previous orders fixing a judgment...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 10149 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Housing Finance Company of Kenya Limited; Respondent: Brick & Mortar Holdings Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 007 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Pre Hearing; Orders on Hearing De Novo Due to Missing Submissions
Outcome
Orders of 17th September 2020 set aside; appeal to be heard de novo before the incoming judge.
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Appeal Procedure, Hearing De Novo, Judicial Transfer
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Appeal Procedure Hearing De Novo Judicial Transfer

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Housing Finance Company of Kenya Limited

Appellant

Brick & Mortar Holdings Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Pre Hearing; Orders on Hearing De Novo Due to Missing Submissions

  1. 1 Whether the appeal can proceed in the absence of parties' written submissions.
  2. 2 Whether the previous orders setting a judgment date should be set aside due to lack of submissions.
  3. 3 Whether the appeal should be heard de novo before the incoming judge.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, due to the absence of the parties' written submissions on the e-filing platform, it could not proceed to consider or determine the appeal on its merits. In the interest of justice and to ensure a fair hearing, the court exercised its discretion to set aside the previous orders fixing a judgment date. The court further directed that the appeal be heard afresh (de novo) before the incoming judge, given the transfer of the presiding judge from the division. This approach upholds the principles of fair hearing and due process, ensuring that both parties have the opportunity to present their arguments and that the appeal is determined on a complete record.

Court Disposition

Orders of 17th September 2020 set aside; appeal to be heard de novo before the incoming judge.

Orders

  • The orders of 17th September 2020 are set aside.
  • The appeal shall be heard de novo before the incoming judge.