[2000] KECA 345 (KLR)

[2000] KECA 345 (KLR)

The court exercised its unfettered discretion under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules to grant the applicant an extension of time to file and serve the memorandum and record of appeal. The absence of opposition from the respondents and the existence of an arguable appeal regarding the disallowance of special...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KECA 345 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hugh Francis Edwards; Respondent: Kenya Bus Services; Respondent: Antony Muia Samuel
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 256 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Extension of time granted.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Special Damages, Pleading Requirements
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process Special Damages Pleading Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hugh Francis Edwards

Applicant

Kenya Bus Services

Respondent

Antony Muia Samuel

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file and serve a memorandum and record of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the refusal to award special damages by the High Court was proper.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its unfettered discretion under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules to grant the applicant an extension of time to file and serve the memorandum and record of appeal. The absence of opposition from the respondents and the existence of an arguable appeal regarding the disallowance of special damages justified the extension. The court found no special reason to decline the application and thus allowed the extension as sought.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Extension of time granted.

Orders

  • Time for filing and serving the memorandum and record of appeal extended by 30 days from the date of the ruling.
  • No order as to costs of the application.