[2021] KEELC 2296 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2296 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff/applicant had advanced plausible reasons to warrant the setting aside of the dismissal order made on 19th September 2019. The application was unopposed, and upon consideration of the supporting affidavit and grounds, the court exercised its discretion to set aside the order and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 2296 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Humphrey Njuguna Ndungu; Defendant: James Mwago Waigi; Defendant: Embakasi Ranching Company Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 659 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit
Outcome
application allowed; suit reinstated
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Orders, Reinstatement of Suit, Dismissal for Non Attendance
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Setting Aside Orders Reinstatement of Suit Dismissal for Non Attendance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Humphrey Njuguna Ndungu

Plaintiff

James Mwago Waigi

Defendant

Embakasi Ranching Company Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit

  1. 1 Whether the order made on 19th September 2019 dismissing the suit should be set aside.
  2. 2 Whether the suit should be reinstated for hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff/applicant had advanced plausible reasons to warrant the setting aside of the dismissal order made on 19th September 2019. The application was unopposed, and upon consideration of the supporting affidavit and grounds, the court exercised its discretion to set aside the order and reinstate the suit. The court further directed the plaintiff to set the suit down for hearing within ninety days, failing which the suit would stand dismissed. Costs of the application were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

application allowed; suit reinstated

Orders

  • The orders of 19th September 2019 are hereby set aside and the plaintiff’s suit is reinstated.
  • The Plaintiff/Applicant is directed to set down the suit for hearing within ninety (90) days of the date of this ruling, failure to which the suit shall stand dismissed.