[2024] KEHC 14588 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established changed circumstances since the previous denial of bail. Specifically, the trial had not been concluded within the three-month period directed by the court, and the applicant had remained in pre-trial custody for over a year. The court also considered the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 14588 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mohamed Saleem Mohamed Hussein; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kibera
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2024
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E012 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Bail Denial
- Outcome
- application allowed; bail granted on specified terms
- Judges
- DR Kavedza
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Changed Circumstances, Pre Trial Custody, Narcotic Offences
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohamed Saleem Mohamed Hussein
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Bail Denial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated changed circumstances to justify review of the previous order denying bail.
- 2 Whether prolonged pre-trial detention and ill health warrant the grant of bail pending trial.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established changed circumstances since the previous denial of bail. Specifically, the trial had not been concluded within the three-month period directed by the court, and the applicant had remained in pre-trial custody for over a year. The court also considered the applicant's advanced age and ill health. These factors, taken together, constituted sufficient grounds to review the earlier order and grant bail on reasonable terms. The court emphasized the importance of balancing the interests of justice, the presumption of innocence, and the right to liberty, particularly where the delay in trial was not attributable to the applicant.
Court Disposition
application allowed; bail granted on specified terms
Orders
- The applicant Mohamed Saleem Mohamed Hussein is admitted to a bond of Kshs. 8,000,000 with one surety.
- The security shall be a fixed asset owned by a Kenyan citizen.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Hussein v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E012 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 14588 (KLR) (25 November 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 14588 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kibera
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E012 of 2023
DR Kavedza, J
November 25, 2024
Between
Mohamed Saleem Mohamed Hussein
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant is jointly charged with five others for the offence of trafficking in narcotic substances contrary to section 4 (a) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) Act no. 4 of 1994 before the Chief Magistrates Court sitting at JKIA. He applied and was were denied bail pending trial on 29th June 2023. He filed an application before this court seeking a revision of the orders of the trial court denying him bail. In a ruling delivered by this court on 22nd July 2024, this court dismissed his application.
2. By a Chamber Summons dated 22nd October 2024, the Applicant seeks a review of this Court’s orders. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by the Applicant’s advocate, Dome Obura. The Applicant avers that in its ruling, this Court directed the trial to be expedited and granted liberty to apply for a review of bail should the case remain undetermined after three months. More than three months have now elapsed, and the case is yet to be concluded. Additionally, the Applicant is experiencing ill health and prays that the Court admits him to reasonable bail terms.
3. The matter was canvassed by way of written submissions. The applicant and respondent filed written submissions which have been duly considered.
4. The issue is whether the applicant has established the existence of changed circumstances to warrant the grant of bail pending trial. In Republic vs. Francis Maina Wairimu [2020] eKLR, Wakiaga J held that:“In an application for review for denial of bail, the applicant is under a duty to convince the court that there had been change of circumstances from the time when he was denied bail to warrant the court reviewing its earlier orders".
5. While the burden of proving changed circumstances may rest with the applicant, this issue must be considered based on the ruling delivered by this court on 22nd July 2024 wherein the court denied the applicant bail but directed the trial court to expedite the trial in view of the fact that the accused is quite elderly. The applicant has argued that the trial is still pending notwithstanding the orders of the court.
6. I agree with the applicant that this court directed the trial court to expedite the trial and as far as possible to be completed within 3 months. Indeed, I note that the applicant has been in pre-trial custody for more than a year.
7. In the premises, this court is obliged to grant reasonable bail terms. The application dated 22nd October 2024 is allowed in the following terms:i.The applicant Mohamed Saleem Mohamed Hussein is admitted to a bond of Kshs. 8,000,000 with one surety.ii.The security shall be a fixed asset owned by a Kenyan citizen.iii.The applicant shall report to the investigating officer every Friday until the conclusion of the trial.iv.The contact person(surety) to avail a copy of his/her National Identity Card, a passport photo and a letter from the chief confirming that he/she has known the applicant for a period of not less than five (5) years.v.The applicant’s landlord shall submit to confirm that the applicant has been his tenant for a period of not less than two (2) years.vi.The applicant shall not leave the jurisdiction of this court until the matter is heard and determined.
RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 25THDAY OF NOVEMBER 2024D. KAVEDZAJUDGEIn the presence of:Dome for the ApplicantMburugu for the RespondentAchode Court Assistant.