[2018] KEHC 10265 (KLR)
The court held that once it has stayed proceedings and referred the dispute to arbitration, its jurisdiction to entertain further applications in the matter is extinguished unless the arbitration has broken down or unless intervention is expressly permitted by law. The court found that the arbitral tribunal was already seized of the dispute and that any further interim measures of protection or enforcement of such measures should be sought from the tribunal, not the court. The court emphasized the principle of party autonomy and the limited scope of judicial intervention in arbitration matters. The replying affidavit filed by the Plaintiffs in opposition to the preliminary objection was...
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 10265 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Hydra Industrial Services Limited; Plaintiff: Al-Shoumouk Engineering Kinetice General Contracting LLC (suing through the 1st Plaintiff under a Master Consortium Agreement Dated 18th May, 2015); Defendant: Geothermal Development Corp; Interested Party: Kreditanstant Fur Wiederaufbau (KFW)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 2018
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 416 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Notice of Motion for Injunctive Orders and Contempt
- Outcome
- preliminary objection upheld; court lacks jurisdiction to hear the application; costs awarded to defendant
- Judges
- GL Nzioka
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Stay of Proceedings, Interim Measures of Protection, Party Autonomy, Court Jurisdiction in Arbitration, Injunctive Relief, Contempt of Court
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hydra Industrial Services Limited
Plaintiff
Al-Shoumouk Engineering Kinetice General Contracting LLC (suing through the 1st Plaintiff under a Master Consortium Agreement Dated 18th May, 2015)
Plaintiff
Geothermal Development Corp
Defendant
Kreditanstant Fur Wiederaufbau (KFW)
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Notice of Motion for Injunctive Orders and Contempt
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain an application for injunctive relief and contempt after staying proceedings and referring the dispute to arbitration.
- 2 Whether the court can grant further interim measures of protection once the arbitral tribunal is seized of the dispute.
- 3 Whether the filing of a replying affidavit in opposition to a preliminary objection is permissible.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that once it has stayed proceedings and referred the dispute to arbitration, its jurisdiction to entertain further applications in the matter is extinguished unless the arbitration has broken down or unless intervention is expressly permitted by law. The court found that the arbitral tribunal was already seized of the dispute and that any further interim measures of protection or enforcement of such measures should be sought from the tribunal, not the court. The court emphasized the principle of party autonomy and the limited scope of judicial intervention in arbitration matters. The replying affidavit filed by the Plaintiffs in opposition to the preliminary objection was...
Court Disposition
preliminary objection upheld; court lacks jurisdiction to hear the application; costs awarded to defendant
Orders
- The preliminary objection is upheld.
- The notice of motion application dated 15th May 2017 is not to be heard as the court lacks jurisdiction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment