[2025] KEHC 259 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 259 (KLR)

The court held that since 45 days had lapsed since the filing of the judicial review application without a hearing, its jurisdiction to determine the matter was ousted by operation of section 175(3) of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act. Consequently, the court could not take any further action on the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 259 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ibka Trading Company Limited; Respondent: Public Procurement Administrative Review Board
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application E206 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Jurisdictional Lapse Due to Statutory Time Limit
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction due to lapse of statutory time limit.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Public Procurement, Judicial Review, Statutory Time Limits
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Public Procurement Judicial Review Statutory Time Limits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ibka Trading Company Limited

Applicant

Public Procurement Administrative Review Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Jurisdictional Lapse Due to Statutory Time Limit

  1. 1 Whether the High Court retains jurisdiction to hear a judicial review application after the lapse of the statutory 45-day period under section 175(3) of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since 45 days had lapsed since the filing of the judicial review application without a hearing, its jurisdiction to determine the matter was ousted by operation of section 175(3) of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act. Consequently, the court could not take any further action on the application, and the file was closed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction due to lapse of statutory time limit.

Orders

  • The file is closed as the court's jurisdiction is ousted by lapse of the statutory 45-day period.