[2018] KEELC 3225 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3225 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant acted diligently by promptly requesting a copy of the judgment soon after its delivery and that the delay in filing the appeal was occasioned by the late provision of the judgment by the court. The absence of a response from the respondent and the evidence of the applicant's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 3225 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Ibrahim Gatobu; Respondent: Mwichwiri Farmers Co. Ltd
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 23 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Out of Time, Judicial Discretion, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Appeals Out of Time Judicial Discretion Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ibrahim Gatobu

Appellant

Mwichwiri Farmers Co. Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant acted diligently in seeking a copy of the judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant acted diligently by promptly requesting a copy of the judgment soon after its delivery and that the delay in filing the appeal was occasioned by the late provision of the judgment by the court. The absence of a response from the respondent and the evidence of the applicant's efforts to obtain the judgment led the court to exercise its discretion in favor of granting leave to file the appeal out of time. The application was therefore allowed, subject to the appeal being filed within seven days from the date of the ruling.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The appeal is to be filed within 7 days from the date of delivery of this ruling, failing which the application will stand as dismissed.
  • The matter to be mentioned after 7 days to ascertain compliance and to close this file.