[2021] KEELC 449 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 449 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with its directions to file written submissions within the stipulated period and did not take steps to prosecute the matter even after being granted an extension. The court concluded that the applicant was not ready to prosecute the case, and therefore, the pending...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 449 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Darara Self Help Group through their Chairman and Group Representative Ibrahim Guyo; Respondent: Benard M’Nkubitu; Respondent: Joseph Murungi; Respondent: Lucia Kabui
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 5 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Ruling on Non Prosecution of Applications
Outcome
pending applications dismissed for non-prosecution; directions issued for further compliance
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Non Prosecution, Compliance With Court Orders, Land Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Non Prosecution Compliance With Court Orders Land Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Darara Self Help Group through their Chairman and Group Representative Ibrahim Guyo

Applicant

Benard M’Nkubitu

Respondent

Joseph Murungi

Respondent

Lucia Kabui

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Ruling on Non Prosecution of Applications

  1. 1 Whether the applicant complied with the court's directions to file written submissions within the stipulated period.
  2. 2 Whether the pending applications should be dismissed for non-prosecution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with its directions to file written submissions within the stipulated period and did not take steps to prosecute the matter even after being granted an extension. The court concluded that the applicant was not ready to prosecute the case, and therefore, the pending applications were dismissed for non-prosecution. The applicant was directed to comply with Order 11 and list the originating summons for directions within 45 days if they wished to proceed further.

Court Disposition

pending applications dismissed for non-prosecution; directions issued for further compliance

Orders

  • The pending applications are dismissed for non-prosecution.
  • The plaintiff to comply with Order 11 and list the originating summons for directions within 45 days.