[2018] KEHC 4598 (KLR)
The court found that there were no compelling reasons presented by the prosecution to deny the accused bail or bond. The pre-bail report did not reveal any risk of flight or likelihood of interference with witnesses. The accused's partner being a witness did not present a sufficient risk, as she already visited him...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 4598 (KLR)
- Parties
- Accused: Ibrahim Mugo Kairu; Prosecutor: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 5 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Bail Application Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for bail allowed.
- Judges
- BC Koech
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond, Presumption of Innocence, Compelling Reasons, Pre Bail Report
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ibrahim Mugo Kairu
Accused
Republic
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Bail Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail or bond pending trial under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bail or bond.
- 3 Whether the accused is a flight risk or likely to interfere with witnesses.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there were no compelling reasons presented by the prosecution to deny the accused bail or bond. The pre-bail report did not reveal any risk of flight or likelihood of interference with witnesses. The accused's partner being a witness did not present a sufficient risk, as she already visited him in remand. The court exercised its discretion to grant bail, emphasizing the constitutional presumption of innocence and the absence of opposition or adverse findings in the pre-bail report. The accused was therefore entitled to bail on reasonable conditions.
Court Disposition
Application for bail allowed.
Orders
- The accused shall be released on a bond of KShs. 1,000,000 with one surety of like sum.
- The accused shall not threaten or interfere with witnesses and shall attend court whenever required.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 5 OF 2018
IBRAHIM MUGO KAIRU ........................... ACCUSED
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ............................................. PROSECUTOR
RULING
1. The accused has filed a notice of motion dated 22nd February, 2018 seeking to be released on bail or bond pending trial. The said motion is brought under Article 49 (1)(h) of the Constitution.
2. It was accused’s case that he qualifies for the orders sought since he is presumed innocent till proven guilty and that he has a fixed abode and is not likely to abscond. He stated in his affidavit in support of his application that if he continues to be in detention, his electronic shop is likely to close down and he will lose his source of livelihood and those depending on the shop as a source of employment are likely to be rendered unemployed. He further stated that he is sickly and needs to seek proper medical care and attention.
3. The prosecution had no opposition to the application and this court directed the Machakos County Probation Officer to file a
pre bail report on the accused which report was prepared and filed.
4. A reading of the report reveals that the accused has no business and has no health issues as alleged. The community however are not uncomfortable with him being released on bond. It was reported that his partner is one of the witnesses and that in the event he is to interfere, he still would do so even if he is not released on bond since she often visits him in remand. The pre bail report is in favour of release of the accused on bond.
5. Article 49 (1) (h) of the Constitution under which the accused has brought his application provides for terms of granting bail and bond. It provides that an accused person has a right to be released on bond or bail on reasonable conditions pending a charge or trial, unless there are compelling reasons not to be released. It is noteworthy that the duty to prove such compelling reasons lies with the prosecution. In the case at hand, the prosecution has not opposed the application but in my view, that does not negate this court’s discretion to consider whether or not it is necessary to grant the prayer for bail and or bond.
6. I have carefully considered the circumstances of this case and find that there is no indication that the accused is a flight risk or is likely to interfere with the witnesses. In the circumstances, I allow the application on the following terms:
a) The accused shall be released on a bond of KShs. 1 Million with one surety of like sum.
b) The accused shall not threaten or in whatever manner interfere with witness (es) and shall attend court without fail whenever required to do so.
c) The accused shall not leave this court’s jurisdiction without this court’s prior permission.
d) The accused shall attend court during the hearing and mention dates without fail until the final determination of the case or until further orders.
e) In default to abide by these terms of bond, the bond shall stand cancelled and his surety called to account.
It so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Machakos this 14th day of August, 2018.
D.K. KEMEI
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Ojiambo - for the Accused
Saoli - for the state
Josephine - Court Assistant