[2018] KEELC 3366 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3366 (KLR)

The court found that there was a valid consent judgment dated 8.11.2016 requiring the defendant, Ali Musa, to execute all transfer instruments to transfer his ¼ share of plot No. 28B Kangeta Market to the plaintiff, Ibrahim Musa Mohammed. The defendant's refusal to execute the transfer documents, despite repeated...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 3366 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Ibrahim Musa Mohammed; Defendant: Ali Musa
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 70 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Execution of Consent Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Transfer of Land, Execution of Judgment, Consent Judgment, Market Plot Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Transfer of Land Execution of Judgment Consent Judgment Market Plot Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ibrahim Musa Mohammed

Plaintiff

Ali Musa

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Execution of Consent Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the court should empower the executive office to execute transfer documents for Ali Musa's share in plot No. 28B Kangeta Market to the applicant in light of the consent judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's refusal to execute the transfer warrants court intervention.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was a valid consent judgment dated 8.11.2016 requiring the defendant, Ali Musa, to execute all transfer instruments to transfer his ¼ share of plot No. 28B Kangeta Market to the plaintiff, Ibrahim Musa Mohammed. The defendant's refusal to execute the transfer documents, despite repeated requests, constituted non-compliance with the court's judgment. To ensure the applicant enjoys the fruits of the judgment and to prevent further injustice, the court held that it was appropriate to empower the executive office to execute the relevant transfer documents on behalf of the defendant. The application was therefore merited and allowed as drawn.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The executive office is empowered to execute the relevant transfer documents to effect the transfer of Ali Musa’s share in plot No. 28B Kangeta Market to Ibrahim Musa Mohammed in conformity with the judgment delivered on 8.11.2016.
  • Costs for and incidental to this application shall be costs in the cause.