[2019] KEHC 6902 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 6902 (KLR)

The court held that once an applicant has exercised the right of appeal and the appeal has been determined, Section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly prohibits the High Court from entertaining a subsequent application for revision of the sentence or conviction. Since the applicant had already appealed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 6902 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ibrahim Onyango Omondi; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 172 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Arson, Criminal Sentencing, Revision Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Arson Criminal Sentencing Revision Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ibrahim Onyango Omondi

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain a revision application where the applicant has already exercised the right of appeal and the appeal has been dismissed.
  2. 2 Whether Section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code bars revision in circumstances where an appeal was available and utilized.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that once an applicant has exercised the right of appeal and the appeal has been determined, Section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly prohibits the High Court from entertaining a subsequent application for revision of the sentence or conviction. Since the applicant had already appealed his conviction and sentence, and the appeal was dismissed, he was barred from seeking revision. The court therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application for revision, and the application was dismissed accordingly.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for revision is dismissed.
  • The file is marked as closed.