[2020] KEELRC 301 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 301 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioner had properly filed a notice of withdrawal before judgment, and there was no opposition or application for costs from the respondents. Exercising its discretion, the court allowed the withdrawal of the petition and made no order as to costs, considering the stage of proceedings and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELRC 301 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Ibrahim Osman Abdi; Respondent: Sawada Ali; Respondent: Principal Secretary, Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National Government; Respondent: Public Service Commission; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition E012 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Withdrawal Before Judgment
Outcome
Petition withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Fair Administrative Action, Constitutional Rights, Withdrawal of Petition
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Constitutional Law Unfair Termination Fair Administrative Action Constitutional Rights Withdrawal of Petition

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ibrahim Osman Abdi

Petitioner

Sawada Ali

Respondent

Principal Secretary, Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National Government

Respondent

Public Service Commission

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Withdrawal Before Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the withdrawal of the petition by the petitioner should be allowed without an order as to costs.
  2. 2 Whether any substantive orders are required following the withdrawal of the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioner had properly filed a notice of withdrawal before judgment, and there was no opposition or application for costs from the respondents. Exercising its discretion, the court allowed the withdrawal of the petition and made no order as to costs, considering the stage of proceedings and absence of contest on costs. The withdrawal terminated the proceedings without a determination on the merits.

Court Disposition

Petition withdrawn with no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The petition stands withdrawn.
  • There is no order as to costs.