[2024] KEELC 4551 (KLR)
The court found that the appeal in question had already been dismissed on 14th February 2022. As a result, the application for stay of execution and maintenance of status quo pending appeal was rendered baseless and without merit. The absence of both the applicant and his advocate in court further supported the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 4551 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohamed Hassan Ibrahim; Respondent: Harron Yelo; Respondent: Nakuracha Haro
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Isiolo
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal 012 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- PM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Status Quo Orders, Appeal Dismissal, Permanent Developments, Substantial Loss, Nugatory Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohamed Hassan Ibrahim
Appellant
Harron Yelo
Respondent
Nakuracha Haro
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment in Marsabit CMCC No. 28 of 2018 pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the status quo should be maintained and respondents restrained from permanent developments on the suit land pending appeal.
- 3 Whether the application is merited given the dismissal of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appeal in question had already been dismissed on 14th February 2022. As a result, the application for stay of execution and maintenance of status quo pending appeal was rendered baseless and without merit. The absence of both the applicant and his advocate in court further supported the decision to dismiss the application. The court concluded that there was no legal basis to grant the orders sought since there was no pending appeal to be preserved or protected by a stay of execution.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 5th February 2024 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Ibrahim v Yelo & another (Environment and Land Appeal 012 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 4551 (KLR) (10 June 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 4551 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Isiolo
Environment and Land Appeal 012 of 2021
PM Njoroge, J
June 10, 2024
Between
Mohamed Hassan Ibrahim
Appellant
and
Harron Yelo
1st Respondent
Nakuracha Haro
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. This application is dated 5th February, 2024 and seeks orders;1. This application be certified as urgent.2. Service be dispensed with in the first instance.3. That a stay of execution in MarsabitCMCC No. 28 of 2018 be granted pending the hearing and determination of this application.4. The court be pleased to grant a stay of execution on MarsabitCMCC No. 28 of 2018 pending hearing and determination of the appeal against the judgment made by the Hon. MR. T.M Wafula on the 24th of June, 2020. 5.That the court do order that the status quo of the suit land be maintained and the defendants to stop the permanent developments they are putting up on the land pending hearing and determination of the appeal.6. The costs of this application be provided for.7. Any other order that meets the ends of justice.1. The application is supported by the affidavit of Mohamed Hassan Ibrahimthe applicant, and has the following grounds;1. That the Hon. Mr T.M Wafula delivered the judgment on the 24th of June, 2020 and I have since appeal lead the said judgment.2. That if a stay of execution is not granted substantial loss may result to the appellant as once as the respondents have embarked on putting up permanent development on the suit land while the appeal is still pending.3. That the appeal has a reasonable chance of success and if execution is carried out it will render the appeal nugatory.4. That the respondents together with one SORI MOGA had encroached the appellants land and when the appellants wrote a demand notice to them the respondent refused to get out the appellants land but one Sori Mogamoved out and demolished his structures, the respondents are currently putting up a permanent structure on the appellants land where Sori Mogamoved out of.5. That there has been no delay in bringing this application.
2. As the appeal was dismissed on 14/2/2022, and the applicant and the advocate are not in court, I find that there is merit to dismiss this application.
3. In the circumstances, this application is hereby dismissed.
DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT ISIOLO THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 IN THE PRESENCE OF:Court assistant: RahmaHON. JUSTICE P.M NJOROGEJUDGE