[2013] KEHC 5342 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

High Court at Mombasa

Civil Application 328 of 2010 [if !mso]> <style> v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif][if gte mso 9]><xml>

800x600

</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><xml>

Normal 0

false false false

EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; font-size:10. 0pt;"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]

1. IDDI IBRAHIM

2. YUSUF NEVIsuing on behalf of all the 127 members of the

Mabirikani Village Land Committee……………………….PLAINTIFFS

VERSUS

1. AINSLEY LEVERATT DOPWELL

2. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF MOMBASA…………..........DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT

By way of an originating summons dated 16th August, 2010 and filed in court on 14th September, 2010, the plaintiffs being the 127 members of MABIRIKANI VILLAGE LAND COMMITTEE seek determination of the following questions:

(1)Whether the applicants be declared to have become entitled by virtue of adverse possession of 40 years of ALL THAT PIECE OF LAND containing an area of 152 acres and 134 acres respectively or thereabout registered under the Registration of Titles Act (Chapter 281) Laws of Kenya in the name of AINSLEY LEVERATT DOPWELL and comprised in Title L.R. 3591 at MAZERAS Mombasa District.

(2)Whether the plaintiffs/Applicants are entitled to be duly registered as proprietors of the suit land by virtue of adverse possession.

(3)THATcosts of this application be provided for.”

The defendants named in the originating summons are Ainsley Leveratt Dopwell as the 1st Defendant/Respondent and the Municipal Council of Mombasa as the 2nd Defendant/Respondent. By a consent dated 27th July, 2011 and filed in court on 28th July, 2011 the plaintiffs and 2nd Defendant reached a consent thus the suit proceeded as against the 1st defendant only. Interlocutory judgment having been entered as against the 1st respondent on 15th July, 2011 the matter proceeded for formal proof on 16th August, 2012.

For the Plaintiffs/Applicants five witnesses testified. These were:

i.YUSUF NEVI PW1- the Chairman of Mabirikani Village Land Committee.

ii.IDDI IBRAHIM PW2– The Deputy Chairman of Mabirikani Village Land Committee.

iii.DANIEL LWAMBI PW3– an occupant of Mabirikani village.

iv.NGOMO JUMA KALUME PW4– an occupant of Mabirikani Village.

v.BAKARI CHILONZO NDEGE PW 5– AN OCCUPANT OF Mabirikani Village.

The parcel of land in question is a 152 acre of landknown asPLOT NO. 885 [section VI and 288 section V] being Title No. 3591 located in the Mazeras area of Mombasa county. All five witnesses told the court that they have occupied the suit land for periods ranging from 26 years to 64 years with many of them having been born on the suit land. They have all constructed family homes on the suit land and many of their loved ones have been buried there. PW1 produced in court a list of the 127 occupants of the village as well as copies of the identity cards of each applicant. In addition PW1 produced in court a copy of a search certificate indicating that the suit land is registered to the 1st Applicant. All the witnesses testify that they have occupied the suit land uninterrupted and unhindered for close to 64 years. All attempts to serve the 1st defendant even by way of substituted service yielded no reply. Clearly a case for adverse possession has been made out. The 1st defendant has clearly condoned and/or acquiesced to the plaintiffs’ occupation and use of his parcel of land for all these years.

The term ‘Adverse possession’ is defined in Halsbery’s Laws of England(Volume 87, 5th Edition] at paragraph 279 as follows:

“……………A person is also regarded for those purposes as having been in adverse possession of an estate of land:

(1)Where he is the successor in title to an estate in the land, during any period of adverse possession by a predecessor in title to that estate; or

(2)During any period of adverse possession by another person which comes between and is continuous with periods of adverse possession of his own.”

Case law on the question of adverse possession abounds. The general rule is that one must be shown to have had long, uninterrupted and unhindered use and possession of the parcel of land in question. This has certainly been demonstrated in this case. The applicants have lived on this land for over 64 years. No person has come forward to claim the land not even the registered owner and no attempt has been made to evict them therefrom. Their claim to the suit land by way of adverse possession has been proved satisfactorily. I therefore do hereby issue a declaration in terms of prayer (1) of this Originating Summons and I find that the Applicants are entitled therefore to be registered as proprietors to the suit land. I make no order on costs.

Dated and delivered in Mombasa this 8th day of February, 2013.

M. ODERO

JUDGE

In the presence of:

Mr. Tindi for Applicants

Court Clerk Mutisya