[2017] KEELC 984 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 984 (KLR)

The court found that the Defendant was not properly served with the application dated 25th March, 2016, as service was effected upon a firm that was not the Defendant's advocates on record at the material time. Consequently, the proceedings of 4th April, 2017, which were conducted in the absence of the Defendant,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 984 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Iddi Shabaan Oniale; Defendant: David Kimani Chege
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 704 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Service and Setting Aside Proceedings
Outcome
proceedings set aside; application to be served afresh
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Setting Aside Proceedings, Inherent Jurisdiction, Affidavit of Service
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Service of Process Setting Aside Proceedings Inherent Jurisdiction Affidavit of Service

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Iddi Shabaan Oniale

Plaintiff

David Kimani Chege

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Service and Setting Aside Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the Defendant was properly served with the application dated 25th March, 2016.
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings of 4th April, 2017 conducted in the absence of the Defendant were regular.
  3. 3 Whether the court should exercise its inherent power to set aside the proceedings and direct fresh hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Defendant was not properly served with the application dated 25th March, 2016, as service was effected upon a firm that was not the Defendant's advocates on record at the material time. Consequently, the proceedings of 4th April, 2017, which were conducted in the absence of the Defendant, were irregular. In the exercise of its inherent jurisdiction under section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, the court set aside those proceedings and directed that the application be served afresh upon the Defendant's current advocates for a new hearing date to be fixed by the court.

Court Disposition

proceedings set aside; application to be served afresh

Orders

  • The proceedings of 4th April, 2017 are set aside.
  • The application dated 25th March, 2016 shall be served upon the Defendant's advocates on record.